Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pedo-Glasses"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== I hope those Pedo-Glasses actually make him a pedo ==
== I hope those Pedo-Glasses actually make him a pedo ==
I would have sex with him, even though I'm under 18.
I would have sex with him, even though I'm under 18.
 
*GTFO and sign your posts, Princess Chris Chan. [[User:Jump|Jump]] 20:07, 21 June 2009 (CEST)
GTFO and sign your posts, Princess Chris Chan. [[User:Jump|Jump]] 20:07, 21 June 2009 (CEST)


== Of Fail ==
== Of Fail ==
Line 9: Line 8:


:Are there any Pedo-Glasses of Win? --[[User:Sonijew|Sonijew]] 03:12, 17 December 2009 (CET)
:Are there any Pedo-Glasses of Win? --[[User:Sonijew|Sonijew]] 03:12, 17 December 2009 (CET)
:Even if the Pedo-Glasses are a relic by themselves, they are not failing in their task. We are not adding the term "Fail" to the PSEye neither.[[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] 03:15, 17 December 2009 (CET)

Revision as of 22:15, 16 December 2009

I hope those Pedo-Glasses actually make him a pedo

I would have sex with him, even though I'm under 18.

  • GTFO and sign your posts, Princess Chris Chan. Jump 20:07, 21 June 2009 (CEST)

Of Fail

Someone needs to move this page to Pedo-Glasses of Fail. –Ich bin schwul, Lynxr. Ich bin schwul.–  01:02, 17 December 2009 (CET)

Are there any Pedo-Glasses of Win? --Sonijew 03:12, 17 December 2009 (CET)
Even if the Pedo-Glasses are a relic by themselves, they are not failing in their task. We are not adding the term "Fail" to the PSEye neither.Griffintown 03:15, 17 December 2009 (CET)