Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sydney Kirsch"

Revision as of 02:01, 13 May 2010

What do we think about the current article name? Can anyone think of a better one? --Ronichu 01:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

I say Sydney Kirsch would be an appropriate name. --User:Shearod 0:12, 13 May 2010 (CST)
Champthom mentioned this. He noted that most troll names (such as Vanessa) tend to be about the troll, while the other information goes under a saga page. Sydney was far, far too short, private and fail to be a saga IMHO. Yet her personality is very unrelated to Chris and therefore shouldn't be awarded its own page (AKA Matthew Devoria). Sydney can be summed up in a few sentences. Yet, there are phone calls as well as emails, so it's not clear cut. I considered 'Sydney Trolling Effort', 'Sydney Trolling Fail' and a few others. This was the most neutral I could think of. --Ronichu 07:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 What do we think about the current article name? Can anyone think of a better one? --[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 01:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 *I say Sydney Kirsch would be an appropriate name. --[[User:Shearod]] 0:12, 13 May 2010 (CST)
+*Champthom mentioned this. He noted that most troll names (such as Vanessa) tend to be about the troll, while the other information goes under a saga page. Sydney was far, far too short, private and fail to be a saga IMHO. Yet her personality is very unrelated to Chris and therefore shouldn't be awarded its own page (AKA Matthew Devoria). Sydney can be summed up in a few sentences. Yet, there are phone calls as well as emails, so it's not clear cut. I considered 'Sydney Trolling Effort', 'Sydney Trolling Fail' and a few others. This was the most neutral I could think of. --[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 07:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)