User talk:Delabonte

At least you get the joke. YOUR AN HERO TO ME, DELABONTE! --Champthom 06:34, 2 May 2009 (CEST)

Oh lol, my bad. Was in grammar nazi mode, fixing typos. --Jump 16:10, 2 May 2009 (CEST)

Congratulations!

You were mentioned in the new video. Nice. --Champthom 22:48, 17 July 2009 (CEST)

• Thanks. This calls for a box to go on my userpage. --Delabonte 04:59, 18 July 2009 (CEST)

• Oh Lord, I just your pro tip on your user page and I LOL'd. --Champthom 16:33, 9 September 2009 (CEST)

Lovely Weather

"Sex under false pretence IS statutory rape. Also saying Chris raped his future wife is funnier."

I'm not going to sit here and have an edit war with you, but I believe you are mistaken, Mr. ex-Minister. I can find no evidence of sex under false pretense being considered rape of any kind. It certainly is sexual assault, but I can't find any legitimate site that claims it to be rape (aside from random postings of failtowns on forums). Unless you can provide some evidence, I'd say that you're simply wrong about that.

On top of that, you're right in saying that it's "funnier" to say that he raped her, but that's not the point. We're supposed to document what actually happened/was implied. We don't need to make up things to make Chris look like more of a douche; he does that for us enough as it is. --Tristran 04:15, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• You're... You're kidding, right? If she doesn't know who he is, and thinks he is someone else, she cannot give consent. Sex without consent is rape. You're pretty gross for arguing that's not what happened, because it totally is. --sonichuis44 04:26, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• She thinks she knows who he is, though. He deceived her and got her to willingly consent to sex with him. That's not rape. It's sexual assault. --Tristran 04:30, 11 December 2009 (CET)
• Every weekend, I'm over at a singles' bar in the area. I always lie out of my ass just to get laid. One week I'm an airplane pilot, the other I'm a venture capitalist, one day I was even a comic book artist. And now you're telling me I'm a rapist? --Lynxr 04:46, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• Of course she thinks she does; that's part of the deception. Look, if I dress up like Jimmy Hill and go over to your house and you go "Oh God, Jimmy Hill!" then tear off my clothes and go down on me (cause u gay like that), then I rip off my mask after jizzing on your face and go "Surprise! I'm really Internet Comedian SonichuIs44!" I've raped you. You consented to sex with Jimmy Hill, not with me. Even if I never reveal I'm not Jimmy Hill, I've raped you; you never consented to sex with me. You could at least try arguing it's not rape based on the fact that she's having sex with Chris either way. And pray tell what is the difference between rape and sexual assault?

Lynxr, you're not telling them that you're someone else though; if you convinced them you're really Tom Hanks, but you're not (I'll assume you're not), you've deceived them. --sonichuis44 04:48, 11 December 2009 (CET)

"It certainly is sexual assault" - what do you think rape is? Time-travel sexual assault laws have yet to be tested, but from where I stand if you have sex with someone knowingly under false pretense, then it's not fully consensual. Also, this is the CWCki not the supreme court. And saying Chris travelled through time to rape his future wife is still funnier. --Delabonte 04:53, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• You both have a interesting definitions of consent. What you're saying is that it isn't consent unless she knows the full truth. That's... horribly illogical and simply untrue. Now, specifically for Sonichuis44, the difference between rape and sexual assault is that rape is entirely forced and without consent (or in some cases of statutory rape, simply consensual sex with a minor). Chris has consent in this case, whether you want to admit that or not. She willingly did it with him, and not under threats or force (unless there's something he's not telling us about this fictional story that he, himself, made up in the first place). It's as simple as that. Maybe what he did violated her, maybe she really wouldn't care all that much if she knew the truth, but it doesn't really matter, but it seems pretty obvious that she agreed to it. Back to the point, though, rape is a subset of sexual assault. Sexual assault involves undesired sexual contact, but it might not involve intercourse in any way (such as sexual touching), or, even if it does... well... that's relative to who's making the rules in whatever jurisdiction. Some things that are generally considered sexual assault in most places are mitigated to full-blown rape status in other places and vice versa. I don't really care to get too into that, but the fact of the matter is that he had her consent, and that's what's relevant here. However, I'm done arguing about this fictional story. Further arguing about a sexual encounter that never happened, nor ever could (as time-travel like that is, from a logical standpoint, absolutely impossible), seems ridiculous. --Tristran 05:17, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• Don't bring logic into this. Also, Chris agrees with you: "You are misunderstood, it was not rape; She mistook me for my future self, and She Asked Me to have sex with her.". This means you are wrong. Good day sir. --Delabonte 05:31, 11 December 2009 (CET)

• We may have had a tense discussion, and you may well have been a piss-poor Minister of Defense, but... I've decided that I like you, Seinor Delabonte. Your lulziness rating qualifies you for the much-coveted Badge of Lulziness and All-Around Goodness, which you may apply for by filling out the form that will be mailed to you shortly. Please allow blah blah blah blah. Good day. --Tristran 06:54, 11 December 2009 (CET)

Temporary ban

Dude, Cody is a newfag but he's trying his best from what I've seen thus far. I don't give a fuck of he's a juggalo elsewhere and as I told BlueSpike, I'm not banning him from CWCki unless he starts shit here. As I said here, I will not ban a user unless they do shit on the CWCki like harass users, vandalism, etc.

Delabonte, I am disappoint, son. --Champthom 02:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

• I apologise. --Delabonte 13:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

PRO TIP

With the welcome template, you have to manually enter your user name so if a new user wanted to ask you a question, there would be a direct link, so it'd look like {{welcome|Delabonte}} and it would provide a link to your talk page where they can ask you a question. Yeah, it's lame but I'm not sure if the process can be automated or anything. --Champthom 09:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I love you

For your "Not a forum" template. You've made me proud.--Champthom 06:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

User Pages

I don't know who you are you what you are, and I don't really care - but don't edit userpages of others. --Anonymax 16:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I should have known. You are a PVCC member and a member of the old guard. A newfag like me has no chance. --16BitAlex 01:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

• You keep repeating this like it's going to make me respect you but continuing with your Autistic actions. Don't shit on my cupcake and tell me it's icing. --Delabonte 04:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
• Hi 16BitAlex. I was informed I'm not allowed to call you a fag on your talk page. So, hi. Fag. Sully 04:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

• HEY GUISE, I MADE A VIDEO THAT WARDS OFF FAGGOTS...

Click to load content

LET ME KNOW IF IT WORKS. ALSO, 16BITALEX TOLD ME HE COVERED HIS DICK IN APPLESAUCE AND LIKED IT. THEN HE ERASED IT TO HIDE THAT FACT. --Fuckingstupid 07:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

• This is good and you should feel good. --Delabonte 07:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Messages to Alex

Why did you eat your homework? --Delabonte 07:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

It tasted better than apples.

And, I cannot accept. To me, eating apples is equivalent to dressing in women's garments, and unlike Chris, I do not have a desire to be a woman (see Crystal the twin sister). --16BitAlex 14:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

BTW, I approve of my quote on your user page, unlike that last one. --16BitAlex 16:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

1) I have no desire for your approval. 2) We're not singling you out here. All PVCC members have to undergo a test of loyalty. This is yours. If you are too cowardly to complete it please refrain from bitching about the PVCC being a closed community, and remember that you had your chance. --Delabonte 01:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

(since Gary was a loser and Ash was here last time) This was against my personal beliefs. Almost anything that didn't involve eating or drinking a vile "healthy" substance, I might have done. And then you have the nerve to spit in my face after you gave me a task I could and would not complete. I AM NOT A COWARD. --16BitAlex 03:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Do you understand the sacrifices people have made to join the PVCC? Trolling Chris at this level requires nerves of steel. It requires somebody willing to face their worst fear. As you yourself have said, you cannot eat an apple. You are a coward and I was wrong to ever think you were one of us. --Delabonte 07:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

What Delabonte said. I have seen trolls go to the highest highs and the lowest lows to achieve lulz. And you? You won't even eat a fucking fruit. That shows you are completely and totally spineless. Getting into the PVCC usually involves proving that you are not a faggot. You haven't. What the hell makes you think you would last 5 minutes in there? We're not spitting in your face, you are spitting in ours. Basically, you want to sit around with your thumb up your ass and be worthless yet still hang out with people who do more than play Rock Band all day. Go back to your plastic instruments you sniveling, chicken-shit, coward. --Fuckingstupid 10:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)