File talk:Sega's Reponse.png

From CWCki
Revision as of 22:52, 27 January 2010 by Beat (talk | contribs) (I'm studying business law.)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

That's pretty cool, but I'm willing to bet the legal team decided to just plain not care.--Beat 02:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

  • I second that. Chandler is our problem and ours alone. --CWCAttack 03:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
    • It's just a cost-benefit decision. A company will usually take no action unless it means a material gain or loss. If a single lawyer works a single hour researching Chris on company time, it's already cost Sega more money than they'll ever make by suing him.--Beat 03:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)