Talk:Sonichu Forum

Yes, it's legit. Copy and paste Chris's posts from here. --Champthom 02:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Premature friend zone placement

So that's news. Apparently as of January 29th Chris actually understood that The wallflower didn't want him bad.--Beat 04:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

This proves us that Chris is one sick puppy. Not only this tells us that all the videos he did on March 2010 when he claims he had a relationship with the Wallflower was false but it also turns the recent text he wrote about her on CWCipedia into a stalker fantasy. Griffintown 05:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

• True, but was there ever any doubt? -Ronichu 06:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
• Hey Griff, I liked the way you described that revelation so I stuck it in the Wallflower (CWCipedia article) page. At least this page isn't completely orphaned now. -Ronichu 06:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

• I know my comment sounds like "No Shit, Sherlock!" but it is so blatantly wrong it enlightens us on how Chris thinks. Feel free to run with anything I say and thanks for using it. Griffintown 15:33, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

"Chris is literally a filthy liar"

Anything suggestions for a less inflammatory title? Yes, in the context it's suggestion Chris is filthy and Chris is a liar, ergo making him a filthy liar but generally it's our policy not to overdo it. So any suggestions for a less inflammatory title for that section? --Champthom 19:16, 21 September 2010 (PDT)

Does "Chris and his filthy lies" work any better? --Anonymax 19:25, 21 September 2010 (PDT)

• I think what we should do is title these e-mails by date and time stamp - less subjective, I say. Unless we can prove without a doubt that he is lying (we can't), I don't like the term "liar" or "lie" being used here.--Champthom 19:44, 21 September 2010 (PDT)

In addition, dated titles have kinda been how we formatted other similar articles. --Anonymax 19:49, 21 September 2010 (PDT)

• • • Not as relevent, but maybe questionable claims or debatable statements? Or something like that, which provokes the idea that what Chris says is under scrutiny. --MEANWHILE 19:50, 21 September 2010 (PDT)