Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Krapplefag"
(New page: ==To do== Fix font color - it's a bit off, as I'm trying to mimic the appearance of the image board. --~~~~) |
m (6 revisions) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==To do== | ==To do== | ||
Fix font color - it's a bit off, as I'm trying to mimic the appearance of the image board. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 09:48, 19 September 2009 (CEST) | Fix font color - it's a bit off, as I'm trying to mimic the appearance of the image board. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 09:48, 19 September 2009 (CEST) | ||
::Dunno if gradients work on here but /cwc/ background color would be a gradient made up of black and a dark red, so a similar dark red to the one on the board would prolly work better if gradients are incompatiple. The rest of the site just reuses 4chan's yotsublue css. --[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] 07:43, 20 September 2009 (CEST) | |||
==Awesome== | |||
-is how I would describe this template, but maybe we could replace the image with a smaller one? What do you guys think? I can fix the white edges on the png if you want. --[[User:Whoreos n' Milf|Whoreos n' Milf]] 05:52, 6 October 2009 (CEST) | |||
<center>1. | |||
{{Award| | |||
bordercolor=#FFC125| | |||
bgcolor=#330000| | |||
textcolor=#FFC125| | |||
titlecolor=#FFC125| | |||
image=KrappleAwesome.jpg| | |||
img_width=50| | |||
width=358px| | |||
title=Krapplefag| | |||
text=This user regularly posts on [[Krapple|/cwc/]]|}} | |||
2. | |||
{{Award| | |||
bordercolor=#FFC125| | |||
bgcolor=#330000| | |||
textcolor=#FFC125| | |||
titlecolor=#FFC125| | |||
image=Awesome small.png| | |||
img_width=50| | |||
width=358px| | |||
title=Krapplefag| | |||
text=This user regularly posts on [[Krapple|/cwc/]]|}} | |||
</center> | |||
==dead men post no images== | |||
now that /cwc/ is gone to valhalla, (rip) can we modify this? "This user once posted on the now-deceased [[Krapple|/cwc/]] in the days of old. Now they wander the [[CWCki | wastes]]..." (i've been listening to alot of iron maiden recently, feel free to change that.) and replace the "awesome" to one more...dead. i would be less vague and more helpful but my mental health was shattered to 0% --[[User:Jump|Jump]] 23:06, 4 November 2009 (CET) | |||
*We're back up at http://legi0n.789can.org/cwc/ --[[User:Whoreos n' Milf|Whoreos n' Milf]] 23:54, 15 November 2009 (CET) | |||
:*And keep the Awesome Face, or so I think. I mean, we still use the old PVCC's NERV theme even though it hasn't looked like that in nearly a year. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 00:14, 16 November 2009 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:29, 3 January 2010
To do
Fix font color - it's a bit off, as I'm trying to mimic the appearance of the image board. --Champthom 09:48, 19 September 2009 (CEST)
- Dunno if gradients work on here but /cwc/ background color would be a gradient made up of black and a dark red, so a similar dark red to the one on the board would prolly work better if gradients are incompatiple. The rest of the site just reuses 4chan's yotsublue css. --Anonymous 07:43, 20 September 2009 (CEST)
Awesome
-is how I would describe this template, but maybe we could replace the image with a smaller one? What do you guys think? I can fix the white edges on the png if you want. --Whoreos n' Milf 05:52, 6 October 2009 (CEST)
 | Krapplefag
This user regularly posts on /cwc/ |
2.
 | Krapplefag
This user regularly posts on /cwc/ |
dead men post no images
now that /cwc/ is gone to valhalla, (rip) can we modify this? "This user once posted on the now-deceased /cwc/ in the days of old. Now they wander the wastes..." (i've been listening to alot of iron maiden recently, feel free to change that.) and replace the "awesome" to one more...dead. i would be less vague and more helpful but my mental health was shattered to 0% --Jump 23:06, 4 November 2009 (CET)
- We're back up at http://legi0n.789can.org/cwc/ --Whoreos n' Milf 23:54, 15 November 2009 (CET)
- And keep the Awesome Face, or so I think. I mean, we still use the old PVCC's NERV theme even though it hasn't looked like that in nearly a year. --Champthom 00:14, 16 November 2009 (CET)