Difference between revisions of "Talk:Common Questions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::::I'm honestly not digging the mailbag format here. It really works better for letters with actual length. Is the format from Questions for Chris really that bad?--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 18:58, 30 December 2009 (CET) | ::::::I'm honestly not digging the mailbag format here. It really works better for letters with actual length. Is the format from Questions for Chris really that bad?--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 18:58, 30 December 2009 (CET) | ||
:::::::*Yeah, why not use that format? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:28, 30 December 2009 (CET) | :::::::*Yeah, why not use that format? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:28, 30 December 2009 (CET) | ||
==Why not Using the Mailbag Format?== | |||
I mean, why not? Chris is answering questions from the public and the said answers are not that longer than the conventional mailbag. Besides, Black on White Q&A is quite hard on the eyes to read. Another arguement; there's no clutter of answers everywhere. These bit-sized pieces of text would be easier to quote and link that way. [[User:Griffintown|Griffintown]] | |||
Revision as of 16:38, 30 December 2009
Should this be linked to Questions for Chris or should this get its own page? It seems like it will be a recurring feature. Thoughts? --Champthom 02:50, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Looks redundant for me. It would make a nice sub-section to Question For Chris. Griffintown 04:47, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Not yet. The Questiosn for Chris page is outdated and this will become recurring...hopefully. Clydec 05:01, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- I have to revise my position. I saw that the Common Questions on CWCipedia got it's own entry. This make it a bona-fide historical document and need to receive it's own entry. Sorry to flip-flop on this but this is just how I see the situation now. Griffintown 05:57, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- i could put a picture of my dick on cwcipedia so it becomes bona-fide. but yeah, right now i'm just stealing all the questions from that page for now. soon, i'll throw some of the mailbag in there as well while the major e-mails get put into the mailbags. so this might become the new mailbag. or something. Clydec 05:59, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Please warn me the day you will post your Bona-Fide Phallus on CWCipedia; I want to do a screen capture of it. :D This being said, I love the Mailbag format and These questions would fit in it easily. Griffintown 07:00, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- i could put a picture of my dick on cwcipedia so it becomes bona-fide. but yeah, right now i'm just stealing all the questions from that page for now. soon, i'll throw some of the mailbag in there as well while the major e-mails get put into the mailbags. so this might become the new mailbag. or something. Clydec 05:59, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- I have to revise my position. I saw that the Common Questions on CWCipedia got it's own entry. This make it a bona-fide historical document and need to receive it's own entry. Sorry to flip-flop on this but this is just how I see the situation now. Griffintown 05:57, 29 December 2009 (CET)
- Not yet. The Questiosn for Chris page is outdated and this will become recurring...hopefully. Clydec 05:01, 29 December 2009 (CET)
Why not Using the Mailbag Format?
I mean, why not? Chris is answering questions from the public and the said answers are not that longer than the conventional mailbag. Besides, Black on White Q&A is quite hard on the eyes to read. Another arguement; there's no clutter of answers everywhere. These bit-sized pieces of text would be easier to quote and link that way. Griffintown