Difference between revisions of "User talk:Shekelberg"
Shekelberg (talk | contribs) |
FokkerTISM (talk | contribs) (→Edit to Cwcisms template: new section) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--[[User:Shekelberg|Shekelberg]] | --[[User:Shekelberg|Shekelberg]] | ||
== Edit to Cwcisms template == | |||
Should we take Niggo off? He only ever used it once, and has probably forgotten he said it. [[User:FokkerTISM|FokkerTISM]] ([[User talk:FokkerTISM|talk]]) 03:51, 24 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:51, 23 September 2017
FantaFAN
Hey man, I've been watching FantaFAN on Twitter for a while and I can tell you that it's 100% Chris-Chan. So I've readded it into the Disguises page. I don't know how to use the summary thing so I'm telling you here seeing as you removed it in the first place. BoradV (talk) 08:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
IMHO there's no chance in hell it's Chris himself. As of the time of writing, the account is not followed by either @CWCSonichu or @NightStar2891, and neither account has replied, liked or even acknowledged any of its tweets. If that's not convincing enough, Chris isn't going to mention Fanta in a sockpuppet's name — that alone makes it more likely it's a ween making fun of his recycling habits than anything else. Supporting this is the multitude of pseudo-sockpuppet accounts that weens have created to masquerade as Chris ever since Night Star was revealed to be him. Both Ponichu (@EquestriaHeart) and SunsetGlimmer (@LadyCadence4991) for example have names that Chris is more likely to come up with for his alts than "FantaFAN".
Considering the above, I'm undoing your edit, but starting a discussion on the article's talk page, you can discuss it there.
(Edit: Here.)
Edit to Cwcisms template
Should we take Niggo off? He only ever used it once, and has probably forgotten he said it. FokkerTISM (talk) 03:51, 24 September 2017 (UTC)