Difference between revisions of "Talk:Thurston Howell III"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Wouldn't this be easier just directing to "Gilligan's Island"?--~~~~) |
m (4 revisions) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wouldn't this be easier just directing to "Gilligan's Island"?--[[User:UncleBastard|UncleBastard]] 06:04, 23 February 2009 (CET) | Wouldn't this be easier just directing to "Gilligan's Island"?--[[User:UncleBastard|UncleBastard]] 06:04, 23 February 2009 (CET) | ||
*I can go either way. I figured it made more sense to name the article for the character, since Chris only needed the name, rather than the entire show, which so far he hasn't ripped off very much. [[User:Dethchemist77|Dethchemist77]] 21:35, 23 February 2009 (CET) | |||
On the one hand, I really don't think this should be its own article considering Thurston Howell III was a major character. But this is an excellent use of the rainbow blinking template that you couldn't do on the Sonichu character list. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 20:07, 13 June 2009 (CEST) | |||
*Err, I meant minor character. But now that I think about it, is it really worth keeping an entire article about a very minor, one shot character just because it has a nice gag to it? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 20:34, 11 December 2009 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:46, 3 January 2010
Wouldn't this be easier just directing to "Gilligan's Island"?--UncleBastard 06:04, 23 February 2009 (CET)
- I can go either way. I figured it made more sense to name the article for the character, since Chris only needed the name, rather than the entire show, which so far he hasn't ripped off very much. Dethchemist77 21:35, 23 February 2009 (CET)
On the one hand, I really don't think this should be its own article considering Thurston Howell III was a major character. But this is an excellent use of the rainbow blinking template that you couldn't do on the Sonichu character list. --Champthom 20:07, 13 June 2009 (CEST)
- Err, I meant minor character. But now that I think about it, is it really worth keeping an entire article about a very minor, one shot character just because it has a nice gag to it? --Champthom 20:34, 11 December 2009 (CET)