Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chris and sex"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Actually, so far so good, but I'm wondering - should we include Chris's views on women in a separate article (like how they're "so sweet" and such) or should we include it here? --~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Actually, so far so good, but I'm wondering - should we include Chris's views on women in a separate article (like how they're "so sweet" and such) or should we include it here? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:11, 28 January 2009 (CET) | Actually, so far so good, but I'm wondering - should we include Chris's views on women in a separate article (like how they're "so sweet" and such) or should we include it here? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 05:11, 28 January 2009 (CET) | ||
It could go under [[Knowledge of Sex and Gender]]. It'd only be a paragraph or so.~[[User:gourmetpickle]] | |||
Revision as of 16:16, 11 March 2009
Actually, so far so good, but I'm wondering - should we include Chris's views on women in a separate article (like how they're "so sweet" and such) or should we include it here? --Champthom 05:11, 28 January 2009 (CET)
It could go under Knowledge of Sex and Gender. It'd only be a paragraph or so.~User:gourmetpickle