Difference between revisions of "Talk:110mb"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (110mb: here today, gone tomorrow!)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


* Box 16 toot toot [[User:Mall Conductor Bear|Mall Conductor Bear]] 06:38, 7 May 2009 (CEST)
* Box 16 toot toot [[User:Mall Conductor Bear|Mall Conductor Bear]] 06:38, 7 May 2009 (CEST)
Why not just buy a domain? Or maybe, a better host?
(Btw, I noticed there are no ads on this site.) [[User:DeLemonoid|DeLemonoid]] 23:24, 10 May 2009 (CEST)
I've never had a problem as long as it's not Meatspin. [[User:Fuckatruck|Fuckatruck]] 06:38, 31 May 2009 (CEST)
== And we're back again! ==
Lets start documenting every time 110mb is down. :3 [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 20:09, 18 September 2009 (CEST)
== Deletion ==
Given that we're not on 110mb anymore, should we even have this page around? Or should we keep it to preserve our trolling heritage? Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
*Yeah, I agree. Just a blurb in the article on ourselves should be suffiient. This is just an eye-bleeding macro and three sentences that are better off elsewhere. Redirect or delete outright. [[User:Apostrophe|Apostrophe]] 03:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:39, 9 February 2010

My rage knows no bounds.

The server decides to die when Chris uploads his most epic videos yet, depriving of autistic manchild goodness.

I can't wait to get back to editing and posting, and masturbating and squirtin'.

Why not just buy a domain? Or maybe, a better host?

(Btw, I noticed there are no ads on this site.) DeLemonoid 23:24, 10 May 2009 (CEST)

I've never had a problem as long as it's not Meatspin. Fuckatruck 06:38, 31 May 2009 (CEST)

And we're back again!

Lets start documenting every time 110mb is down. :3 RachmaninovDESU 20:09, 18 September 2009 (CEST)

Deletion

Given that we're not on 110mb anymore, should we even have this page around? Or should we keep it to preserve our trolling heritage? Thoughts? --Champthom 06:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Yeah, I agree. Just a blurb in the article on ourselves should be suffiient. This is just an eye-bleeding macro and three sentences that are better off elsewhere. Redirect or delete outright. Apostrophe 03:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)