Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gaybian"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: No offense, but couldn't this article be merged with "homos"? Just a suggestion. --~~~~)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
No offense, but couldn't this article be merged with "homos"? Just a suggestion. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:21, 10 February 2009 (CET)
No offense, but couldn't this article be merged with "homos"? Just a suggestion. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:21, 10 February 2009 (CET)
Anyone think the article should mention that lesbian is natural because it is hot?  I'm unsure of adding it so I'm putting it here. --[[User:Ritegroic|Ritegroic]] 07:10, 11 March 2009 (CET)

Revision as of 02:10, 11 March 2009

No offense, but couldn't this article be merged with "homos"? Just a suggestion. --Champthom 06:21, 10 February 2009 (CET)

Anyone think the article should mention that lesbian is natural because it is hot? I'm unsure of adding it so I'm putting it here. --Ritegroic 07:10, 11 March 2009 (CET)