Talk:Chris and art

To do

• ED had, somewhere or sometime or somehow, copies of the drawings that Chris traced to produce the Rosechu "self-centerfolds". Please add them - good examples of exactly how he traces poses and stuff.
  • I would but I'm not saving that shit to this computer...here are the pictures anyway if there's someone less squeamish who is willing to do it. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] --James Lamp-Eye 23:28, 7 October 2009 (CEST)

...

Something tells me that Chris never gives a jack about using the basic shapes. Has he ever picked up a how-to-draw book in his life?

Methinks he either hasn't, or that the most advanced he ever had were along the lines of "How to Draw Sonic the Hedgehog." I've heard the style described as "colored-in outlines," common among rank amateurs. Rather than blocking out anatomy, they just draw a rough outline of what the character is shaped like, creating a gruesome mess. Ensign disposable 22:44, 10 September 2009 (CEST)

Finally, a new analysis page I can get into! I added a bit about how it appears he does no practice or sketching. I actually think that's the main reason his drawings are so terrible. He DOES show some improvement over time, which indicates the capacity for it... but he's so lazy that he won't put in the effort to make use of it. Nearly anyone Everyone who can draw worth a damn has a hundred hideous sketches for every good drawing (Trust me, as a drawfag and former psuedo-art-student, I know all too well.). As Chuck Jones said, everyone's got a hundred thousand bad drawings in 'em. Chris is just too lazy to get them out. - Needlepants 02:38, 4 October 2009 (CEST)

First Known Drawing

That picture of Sonic was from when he was FIFTEEN?! Holy shit! I thought that was EARLIER THAN THAT! That looks like an 9-10 year old drew that! Not that his artwork has improved that much, but JESUS! --Blazer 19:00, 22 September 2009 (CEST)

• I'm guessing it's a joke, but you'd be surprised... --Champthom 01:22, 8 October 2009 (CEST)

• Just thought of something - Sonic didn't come out until 1991. This means Chris must have been at least 9 when he made that. Still shitty art for a 9 year old. --Champthom 01:28, 8 October 2009 (CEST)

• Eh, if it were drawn when he was nine, it's not that bad. If it were indeed drawn when he was 15, then holy crap. - Needlepants 19:06, 25 October 2009 (CET)

I'd like to see a source on that- not that I think it's impossible, but just to be sure. He was definitely at least nine, though, since that's when Sonic first came out. Pugs Malone 19:46, 22 September 2009 (CEST)

Comic writing

Here's something I've been thinking lately: I could go on and on about Chris as a comic writer and the various corners he has painted himself into, but I don't think this page is the appropriate place for that, because it mostly covers his visual gaffes. Should we split this into something like "Chris and writing"? I know we have Chris and English, but that's more for deep-level language, word use and semantic analysis rather than exploring Chris's writing on higher level. Also, such writing page could cover Chris's failures in his other literary achievements. --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 12:29, 2 December 2009 (CET)

• Yeah, I think a "Chris and Writing" section would really work in this case. --Blazer 17:24, 2 December 2009 (CET)

Chris knows his art is childish. Sort of.

Chris has been insisting in his personalized Mailbag 50 that he knows his art is childish because he is "trying to push the envelope on the standards of quality" and that he's trying to envoke "childish innocence" and bullshit like that. Where would the best section be to talk about this? Fefnir 21:23, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

I think we should put up some small-children's drawings and compare them side by side for good measure. Perhaps that will give a more accurate perspective of Chris's quality. Anyone else think this is a good idea? I've already started looking for decent comparisons to contrast with Chris SargentPickles 12:23, 12 May 2010 (EST)

Rewrite

I've just given this article a major rewrite. I ended up cutting out almost seventeen thousand characters, but I did my best to keep the message of the article intact and consistent. I apologize if my revision seems too drastic. CWCspatcher 04:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Great work. Also a good proof that I have a tendency to ramble needlessly and often need an editor. =) --wwwwolf (wake me when you need me) 19:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Glad you liked it. I'm most of the way done with a like-styled rewrite of "Chris and Writing." CWCspatcher 20:20, 11 May 2010 (UTC)