Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kazmeyer"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎re: SSI/SSDI: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:


Hey, sorry for the confusion on that page. I've been trying to find where Chris or Bob talks about them filing with the work history, can you point me to that? Just curious. And thanks [[Image:Horse3.gif|Horsehorsehorse]] [[User talk:Horsehorsehorse|Talktalktalk]] 04:01, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
Hey, sorry for the confusion on that page. I've been trying to find where Chris or Bob talks about them filing with the work history, can you point me to that? Just curious. And thanks [[Image:Horse3.gif|Horsehorsehorse]] [[User talk:Horsehorsehorse|Talktalktalk]] 04:01, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
:No worries.  Unfortunately, I don't have the source; it's just been a long-standing argument by the "sink Chris's tugboat" crowd that there had to be some fraud going on because they used Bob's social security information, which you do when applying for SSDI for a dependent child without a work history.  My guess is it's in an IRC or a Mumble somewhere.  I don't think we've ever gotten direct confirmation on the SSDI/SSI thing, but given all the apocryphal info, the size of the payment, and the fact that Chris doesn't bitch about having to meet with examiners every couple of months to tabulate his assets I'm pretty sure it's disability.
:It also kind of deflates the "Chris is leeching off the taxpayers" argument, too, because what he's really leeching off of is Bob's contributions. [[User:Kazmeyer|Kazmeyer]] 06:57, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
::Ah... yeah, that was something else I was puzzled about on that page. That first paragraph about his benefits just bugged me, esp the bit about "need-based welfare", but I guess I understand the trolling mentality that would want to rock the boat for Chris, pun intended. I don't particularly agree with it; Chris ''is'' legally disabled after all and for all indications would not be able to hold down a job with his emotional development jammed in neutral as it is, but it's better I guess to not give people more reasons to slam him. Not like they need more. Thanks for catching it when you did [[Image:Horse3.gif|Horsehorsehorse]] [[User talk:Horsehorsehorse|Talktalktalk]] 13:11, 4 October 2010 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 15:11, 4 October 2010

Hi there!

Welcome to CWCKI!

Welcome to CWCki! There's a lot to do around here because Chris never does anything himself. I hope you'll stay with us and make many improvements of your own!

Before you start, be sure to read A Quick Guide to CWCki. This will guide you through the dos and don'ts of editing the world's most accurate wiki. Be especially sure to read this if you consider Anonymous to be legion or if you've just come over from ED. Everything you know is wrong.
Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.
If you're looking for things to do, check out the priority listing for things that need to be done, or join a project.
If you haven't already, create a user page about yourself! If you do, we'll be able to know you better as a member of our community. Just be sure to check out the guidelines first.
Questions? Please read the FAQ first. Later, you can ask in the Community Portal or on the "discussion" page associated with each article, join the live chat in our IRC channel or post a message on [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]!
Once again, welcome to CWCki!

--Delabonte 12:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

My bad man

For some reason I confused you and officerJulay.--Beat 02:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

No worries, figured that was the case. Kazmeyer 02:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

THE CWCKI FORUM

http://cwckiforum.proboards.com IT'S LIKE PVCC FOR CWCKI PEOPLE! Dr. Herodotus P. Shoggoth :Doktor of the Forbidden Sciences, Medallion Guardian, Imperial Emu, Emeritus of the Ancient and Justified Order of the Turtle 13:48, 17 August 2010 (PDT)

re: SSI/SSDI

Hey, sorry for the confusion on that page. I've been trying to find where Chris or Bob talks about them filing with the work history, can you point me to that? Just curious. And thanks Horsehorsehorse Talktalktalk 04:01, 4 October 2010 (PDT)

No worries. Unfortunately, I don't have the source; it's just been a long-standing argument by the "sink Chris's tugboat" crowd that there had to be some fraud going on because they used Bob's social security information, which you do when applying for SSDI for a dependent child without a work history. My guess is it's in an IRC or a Mumble somewhere. I don't think we've ever gotten direct confirmation on the SSDI/SSI thing, but given all the apocryphal info, the size of the payment, and the fact that Chris doesn't bitch about having to meet with examiners every couple of months to tabulate his assets I'm pretty sure it's disability.
It also kind of deflates the "Chris is leeching off the taxpayers" argument, too, because what he's really leeching off of is Bob's contributions. Kazmeyer 06:57, 4 October 2010 (PDT)
Ah... yeah, that was something else I was puzzled about on that page. That first paragraph about his benefits just bugged me, esp the bit about "need-based welfare", but I guess I understand the trolling mentality that would want to rock the boat for Chris, pun intended. I don't particularly agree with it; Chris is legally disabled after all and for all indications would not be able to hold down a job with his emotional development jammed in neutral as it is, but it's better I guess to not give people more reasons to slam him. Not like they need more. Thanks for catching it when you did Horsehorsehorse Talktalktalk 13:11, 4 October 2010 (PDT)