Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jackie E-mails 23"
Xavier orona (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--~~~~") |
Blue Bully (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--[[User:Xavier orona|Xavier orona]] 02:01, 3 December 2010 (PST) | Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--[[User:Xavier orona|Xavier orona]] 02:01, 3 December 2010 (PST) | ||
I made a minor edit just to fix the benefits & blah blah blah. If no one likes it you guys can change it to whatever u guys like. [[User:ShinGokuIAM|ShinGokuIAM]] 10:40, 6 December 2010 (PST) | |||
How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. [[User:Draygoon|Draygoon]] 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST) | |||
:I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a [[User:Draygoon/CWCism|sandbox page]] and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST) | |||
So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? [[User:Blue Bully|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST) | |||
Never mind I checked, it's not. [[User:Blue Bully|Blue Bully]] 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:44, 16 December 2020
Holy fuck, did I really do that for... 17 sets of e-mails? Well; spielcheck, grammar, links, and format, fellas, 'cause I'm tired and got a final in the morning.--Xavier orona 02:01, 3 December 2010 (PST)
I made a minor edit just to fix the benefits & blah blah blah. If no one likes it you guys can change it to whatever u guys like. ShinGokuIAM 10:40, 6 December 2010 (PST)
How repeatedly does Chris have to say something for it to be considered a CWCism? "Hurtful Truth Level" is sticking out at me as one of those times where he has to simplify an abstract concept into something quantifiable like a video game level in order for him to understand it. Draygoon 04:14, 2 January 2011 (PST)
- I don't think it's an exact science. If you see it a lot, it's a good idea to compile the sources and either get someone else to make an article or make a sandbox page and start one. The CWCism pages don't require that many sources, if memory serves. Freecell 10:43, 2 January 2011 (PST)
So is all that about his duck true? Is it no longer bent? Blue Bully 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST) Never mind I checked, it's not. Blue Bully 2:41 December 16 2020 (CST)