Difference between revisions of "User talk:DawnDusk"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
NotChrisChan (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT) | It was decided that the [[Bob]] article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
:I refer you to [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Bob_Chandler&diff=146710&oldid=146704 this] edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. We're a wiki, and you don't see sections entitled "Passing away" on articles about people who have died. As you thoughtfully entitled your talk page message to me - the use of "passing away" is indeed use of weasel words - which should be avoided on wikis. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT) | :I refer you to [http://sonichu.com/w/index.php?title=Bob_Chandler&diff=146710&oldid=146704 this] edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. We're a wiki, and you don't see sections entitled "Passing away" on articles about people who have died. As you thoughtfully entitled your talk page message to me - the use of "passing away" is indeed use of weasel words - which should be avoided on wikis. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
== Re: Image changes == | |||
We were discussing it on IRC at the time. Basically we decided to let it play for a few hours, to see if there was any logic or reasoning behind the "overwriting" of the photos. If it happens again, IRC is probably the best place to be. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 07:16, 11 November 2011 (PST) | |||
== Re: IP == | |||
Don't know. Wait and see. [[User:Alan Pardew|Alan Pardew]] 00:07, 4 January 2014 (PST) | |||
== I FOUND YOU == | |||
Well you think it's cool to call a black guy a nigger??? I never! [[User:NotChrisChan|I AM NOT CHRIS]] 22:18, 2 February 2015 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:18, 22 February 2015
He's Dead, Jim.
It was decided that the Bob article, and various other places in the CWCki, should refer to him as having died or as being dead - rather than pander around it by saying "passed away". Please refrain from undoing any edits which are contrary to this convention. Thanks --Anonymax 14:27, 19 September 2011 (PDT)
- I refer you to this edit which prettymuch sums it up. You reverted an edit that had already been reverted before - and I personally agree that there's no point in using "passed away" when "died" works fine. We're a wiki, and you don't see sections entitled "Passing away" on articles about people who have died. As you thoughtfully entitled your talk page message to me - the use of "passing away" is indeed use of weasel words - which should be avoided on wikis. --Anonymax 21:09, 20 September 2011 (PDT)
Re: Image changes
We were discussing it on IRC at the time. Basically we decided to let it play for a few hours, to see if there was any logic or reasoning behind the "overwriting" of the photos. If it happens again, IRC is probably the best place to be. --Anonymax 07:16, 11 November 2011 (PST)
Re: IP
Don't know. Wait and see. Alan Pardew 00:07, 4 January 2014 (PST)
I FOUND YOU
Well you think it's cool to call a black guy a nigger??? I never! I AM NOT CHRIS 22:18, 2 February 2015 (PST)