Difference between revisions of "File talk:Kacey2.jpg"
m |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::also even if she did find out it was up here she'd probably shit herself and do nothing, just saiyan [[User:Zero|Zero]] ([[User talk:Zero|talk]]) 10:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC) | ::also even if she did find out it was up here she'd probably shit herself and do nothing, just saiyan [[User:Zero|Zero]] ([[User talk:Zero|talk]]) 10:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
I agree with Nega this pic needs to be removed because it carries a possibility of harming Kacey's life, it reflects what Chris stated in one of his videos "jobs don't just search criminal records anymore they search everything on the dang about you on the dang internet." not an exact quote but I feel like it will do. [[User:Sinistersnare|Sinistersnare]] ([[User talk:Sinistersnare|talk]]) | |||
== why doxing trolls is bad?== | == why doxing trolls is bad?== | ||
Guys, I'm not gonna dox anyone but I have a lil' question. What the fuck with this "secrecy" about Liquid, Kacey, Wallflower etc... Firstly, their dox are already well-known on *chans. Secondly, (IMHO) no one will troll them just because they're doxed or something... these people are fucking re-ti-red, their sagas ended in 2009s, nobody gives a shit about them or their anonymity. Unless the doxed trolls worry that Chris can sue them for cyberbullying... --[[User:Gunter|Gunter]] ([[User talk:Gunter|talk]]) 18:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC) | Guys, I'm not gonna dox anyone but I have a lil' question. What the fuck with this "secrecy" about Liquid, Kacey, Wallflower etc... Firstly, their dox are already well-known on *chans. Secondly, (IMHO) no one will troll them just because they're doxed or something... these people are fucking re-ti-red, their sagas ended in 2009s, nobody gives a shit about them or their anonymity. Unless the doxed trolls worry that Chris can sue them for cyberbullying... --[[User:Gunter|Gunter]] ([[User talk:Gunter|talk]]) 18:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:In retrospect I may have overreacted. This image actually has some advantages to our mission of documenting Chris, as it shows what kind of women he's willing to pursue (although we already know that from the [[Hambeast]]). - [[User:NegaCWC|NegaCWC]] ([[User talk:NegaCWC|talk]]) 14:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
::I don't mind there being a photo of her, but how recent is this? I know she was chubby when she was trolling Chris, but I've read that she's gotten much fatter in the meantime. And, of course she's older now. So maybe a photo of her circa Liquid Saga would be best? --[[User:Holdek|Holdek]] ([[User talk:Holdek|talk]]) 19:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:00, 25 October 2014
Not cool. This woman was willing to go and meet Chris personally in order to gather information about him and provide us with lulz. Shit like that (presuming this is a real picture of Kacey to begin with) could be discouraging to future trolls. Why should anyone try to go on fake dates with Chris again if it's very likely she'll be doxed on the CWCki? I say we delete this. - NegaCWC (talk) 11:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- it's a picture of how Chris knew her. It's not her real name or personal information. Also this info is pretty well known, how she looks isn't a secret.--Samwell (talk) 16:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Dare I point out the implied double-standard here with the picture of Fatass here compared to the picture of Megan elsewhere? Plus she at different points had been discussed by name on the forums and anyone with a good memory could share the information or look deeper and share that info with people. As for the fake date thing, why the fuck would anyone (or rather, how could they) go on an outing with him at this point anyway? Point is, this picture being on here is largely harmless and probably won't do her much damage because she's largely remembered by most who interacted with her as a twat and annoying by many spectators (so not much more to be done, basically), resulting in people not really caring about her outside the context of Chris trolling. Zero (talk) 10:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Nega this pic needs to be removed because it carries a possibility of harming Kacey's life, it reflects what Chris stated in one of his videos "jobs don't just search criminal records anymore they search everything on the dang about you on the dang internet." not an exact quote but I feel like it will do. Sinistersnare (talk)
why doxing trolls is bad?
Guys, I'm not gonna dox anyone but I have a lil' question. What the fuck with this "secrecy" about Liquid, Kacey, Wallflower etc... Firstly, their dox are already well-known on *chans. Secondly, (IMHO) no one will troll them just because they're doxed or something... these people are fucking re-ti-red, their sagas ended in 2009s, nobody gives a shit about them or their anonymity. Unless the doxed trolls worry that Chris can sue them for cyberbullying... --Gunter (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- In retrospect I may have overreacted. This image actually has some advantages to our mission of documenting Chris, as it shows what kind of women he's willing to pursue (although we already know that from the Hambeast). - NegaCWC (talk) 14:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- I don't mind there being a photo of her, but how recent is this? I know she was chubby when she was trolling Chris, but I've read that she's gotten much fatter in the meantime. And, of course she's older now. So maybe a photo of her circa Liquid Saga would be best? --Holdek (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)