Difference between revisions of "Talk:June 2014 leaks"

Latest revision as of 21:49, 5 July 2014

Redirect to:

Revision as of 09:23, 21 June 2014 (view source) CWCTime (talk \| contribs) (→‎Should cursive transcriptions be added? If so, where?: new section)		Latest revision as of 21:49, 5 July 2014 (view source) Alan Pardew (talk \| contribs) m (Redirected page to Talk:Manchester High Leaks)
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Should cursive transcriptions be added? If so, where? ==~~		#REDIRECT [[Talk:Manchester_High_Leaks]]

	Some users on the forums have complained about not being able to (easily) read Chris's cursive handwriting. I transcribed the Amendment timeline [[User:CWCTime/27 Amendment Timeline\|here]] but I didn't insert it in this page because I thought it might make the page way too long/cluttered. I'm not sure that a separate article for each document is necessary (unless analyzing each document is not too spergy for the CWCki). Would a collapsible box on this page be a good way to add the transcriptions? A CWCki Forums user has [http://cwckiforums.com/threads/chriss-writing-leak-20jun14.3963/#~~post-258353 transcribed] one of the more recent leaks. There may be other transcriptions on the forums (I haven't completely caught up yet). --~~[[~~User~~:~~CWCTime\|CWCTime~~]] ~~([[User talk:CWCTime\|talk]]) 13:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)~~