Difference between revisions of "Talk:IRC (26 October 2008)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Chris's Sonichu IRC Chloe Introduction to Talk:IRC (26 October 2008): It's a unique chat, but is it really that unique to warrant its own title? Time for a more conventional title.) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Renaming== | ==Renaming== | ||
Should we give this a more conventional IRC name (that is, something along the lines of [[IRC (26 October 2008)]]? This is a significant one but you can argue there's something significant in each of the IRC chats. Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:44, 19 December 2009 (CET) | Should we give this a more conventional IRC name (that is, something along the lines of [[IRC (26 October 2008)]]? This is a significant one but you can argue there's something significant in each of the IRC chats. Thoughts? --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 12:44, 19 December 2009 (CET) | ||
:Definitely--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 16:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:58, 1 June 2010
Excellent work here. --Champthom 04:55, 11 February 2009 (CET)
Renaming
Should we give this a more conventional IRC name (that is, something along the lines of IRC (26 October 2008)? This is a significant one but you can argue there's something significant in each of the IRC chats. Thoughts? --Champthom 12:44, 19 December 2009 (CET)
- Definitely--Beat 16:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)