Difference between revisions of "Talk:Other documents"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (9 revisions)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


**I've added sections for every random statement. I also concur that renaming the article would be a good idea. To clarify regarding the source(s) of the material, a fair amount of the random statements are from ED Edits or his old MySpace blog, along with a few quotes.--[[User:Staypuft|Staypuft]] 01:44 GMT, 8 July 2009
**I've added sections for every random statement. I also concur that renaming the article would be a good idea. To clarify regarding the source(s) of the material, a fair amount of the random statements are from ED Edits or his old MySpace blog, along with a few quotes.--[[User:Staypuft|Staypuft]] 01:44 GMT, 8 July 2009
== Two years on... ==
...and this page is still a mess. Why's nothing sourced? Why is nothing formatted? Why are all these documents here when I recognise many of them from other pages where they would be more appropriate? Why are all of these documents specifically here when other stuff of this calibur like PSN comments just go in some other page? More to the point, why does this page still even ''exist''? --[[User:Old meme|Old meme]] 10:10, 13 May 2011 (PDT)
== Three years on... ==
...and this page is still trash. --[[User:Cumlord supreme|Cumlord supreme]] ([[User talk:Cumlord supreme|talk]]) 23:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
==Four years on...==
...and I tried to fix it. As noted above, one problem is that these edits to ED are not sourced, and I don't know if this can be tracked down. It's before my time. I also deleted the recent addition regarding the autographed photo, because all that has been included, appropriately, on the "Autographed Photos" page
For the most part, I don't see why this page couldn't be deleted altogether and everything moved to other, easier-to-find pages. The ED edits belong on the ED page. The Wesley Mem notes belong on the Wesley Mem page. I'm sure we can find homes for these orphans. -asperhes, 12/30/14

Latest revision as of 21:53, 30 December 2014

Organization?

This page is a bit messy; maybe we can organize it somehow? Also, maybe it should be named something else, since "other" isn't really that descriptive. How about "Misc. Statements from Chris", or something along those lines? --Lime (Scold? | Undo?) 21:03, 5 March 2009 (CET)

    • Lime does make a valid point. Also, where the hell did this come from? I'm guessing his MySpace but it's not clear where they came from, as I think there was another place Chris blogged. --Champthom 16:44, 12 March 2009 (CET)
Chris had a blog on his MySpace and I think some of these things were on there at one time. But I think what all of them have in common is that he added them to the ED article about himself at various points in 2007-2008. I've been thinking we need an article about the content of his ED edits, so once we get that done we might not even need an Other article anymore. --MachPunch 05:26, 15 March 2009 (CET)
    • I added the top quote to the Encyclopedia Dramatica article as there isn't really a page under "Historical Documents" on all the shit he's posted on ED. I'll add the two current quotes as well. I didn't want to edit it out of this article, as it may be used in another. --FantasticHam 02:20 GMT, 18 May 2009
    • I've added sections for every random statement. I also concur that renaming the article would be a good idea. To clarify regarding the source(s) of the material, a fair amount of the random statements are from ED Edits or his old MySpace blog, along with a few quotes.--Staypuft 01:44 GMT, 8 July 2009

Two years on...

...and this page is still a mess. Why's nothing sourced? Why is nothing formatted? Why are all these documents here when I recognise many of them from other pages where they would be more appropriate? Why are all of these documents specifically here when other stuff of this calibur like PSN comments just go in some other page? More to the point, why does this page still even exist? --Old meme 10:10, 13 May 2011 (PDT)

Three years on...

...and this page is still trash. --Cumlord supreme (talk) 23:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Four years on...

...and I tried to fix it. As noted above, one problem is that these edits to ED are not sourced, and I don't know if this can be tracked down. It's before my time. I also deleted the recent addition regarding the autographed photo, because all that has been included, appropriately, on the "Autographed Photos" page For the most part, I don't see why this page couldn't be deleted altogether and everything moved to other, easier-to-find pages. The ED edits belong on the ED page. The Wesley Mem notes belong on the Wesley Mem page. I'm sure we can find homes for these orphans. -asperhes, 12/30/14