Talk:Spooky Bones

Redirect?

I need a concensus on whether or not this redirect, and all others relevant to Spooky, should stay or not. I was thinking about making a page on Spooky at some point due to their impact on Christory, but just merged that into the chat log userpage I made for them, hence the redirect. Psycho 🐧 (talk) 18:19, 15 June 2025 (EDT)

What impact? Ayumu Kasuga (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2025 (EDT)

Mostly how they spread misinformation, some of which Chris repeated in videos and jail letters. I wasn't sure if that was significant enough for a full-on page, however, so I just put the relevant information in the userpage instead. Psycho 🐧 (talk) 18:37, 15 June 2025 (EDT)

I do not think Spooky Bones deserves a page but stuff about him can go in the gossip page. BaboonRancher23 (talk) 19:25, 15 June 2025 (EDT)

How do you suppose we go about that? Like, do we talk about them in the sections about Bella and related figures? Psycho 🐧 (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2025 (EDT)

Talking about them in the section for Bella and related figures would be good. BaboonRancher23 (talk) 19:05, 22 June 2025 (EDT)

Spooky Bones Page Size

I appreciate the passion put into these articles. But I feel some of the sections on this article could be condensed down a bit. Spooky Bones is a very minor part in Chris's history as opposed to someone like Alec Benson Leary(who's page is much smaller). Perhaps some of this stuff could be more summarized? Master (talk) 13:24, 26 October 2025 (EDT)

I think we could mainly cut down on the stuff about Fiona. A majority of the page is really just context for how certain popular rumors became prevalent amongst the CWC community, and how Chris wound up repeating them. Pretty much everything else you need to know about Spooky is already in some of my userpages. Maybe we could condense the page a little bit so that the context is still there, but it isn't as wordy. Psycho 🐧 (talk) 13:44, 26 October 2025 (EDT)

Yeah, I just think parts just need to just use much less words. The meaning can still be retained mostly. Master (talk) 13:52, 26 October 2025 (EDT)

I noticed some sections seem angry in its Tone

I understand this is not Wikipedia. But it kind of reads more like a Conservapedia article would on a democrat, hindering the article to a comical degree. I feel like you should rewrite some sections. Still keeping them concise. I made my edit, however I wish I got it a bit smaller... Master (talk) 20:06, 28 October 2025 (EDT)

Admittedly...having known Spooky personally, some of those portions were written out of frustration towards her, so I'm definitely going to have a bias against her. Feel free to rewrite where necessary.Psycho 🐧 (talk) 20:14, 28 October 2025 (EDT)

However, under all that there are nuggets of gold. I actually believed Bella had extorted Chris until editing this. I think there is a bit of useful information in this.Master (talk) 20:23, 28 October 2025 (EDT)

Fiona Bias

This got removed from the page, but I personally think it's somewhat important to include the fact that Spooky was very obviously biased towards Snoo compared to the other people involved in the Twilight and Incest Sagas. It provides context for the provided quote about how she wasn't in the "same category" as the other orbiters, and it provides context for some of Spooky's actions and opinions. Psycho 🐧 (talk) 22:19, 28 October 2025 (EDT)

I'm not entirely sure what you are referring to. I removed info irrelevant to Spooky Bones or Chris, redundant info, some stuff on CWCKi policy and actions, some quotes, and see also links of subjects that are already in the article. I don't think I touched any important info. I did remove a line that was info in the Snoo section, but it was info already covered by the quote. Master (talk)

I was talking about this portion: "Contributing to these sentiments, Spooky also held the belief that Fiona was in no way comparable to the other orbiters that she targeted, exhibiting a clear bias in favor of Fiona." Psycho 🐧 (talk) 23:02, 28 October 2025 (EDT)

I removed that because it said the same exact thing in the quote just below it. If you want to keep that, replace the quote with it. I made a decision to either remove it or the quote and I just chose the line. Master (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2025 (EDT)