Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rejected Mailbag"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: '''"It should be understood that Chris does not actually place all the e-mails he deletes in the rejected mailbox. As of this writing, many of the messages Chris has deleted have not been ...)
 
m (9 revisions)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''"It should be understood that Chris does not actually place all the e-mails he deletes in the rejected mailbox. As of this writing, many of the messages Chris has deleted have not been recorded on this page."''' Are you talking about ones that were posted and just deleted off the main page, or ones that didn't get through in the first place? I understand that sometimes emails aren't always getting through for some reason, and it isn't Chris's doing. --[[User:Anaconda|Anaconda]] 07:39, 28 November 2009 (CET)
'''"It should be understood that Chris does not actually place all the e-mails he deletes in the rejected mailbox. As of this writing, many of the messages Chris has deleted have not been recorded on this page."''' Are you talking about ones that were posted and just deleted off the main page, or ones that didn't get through in the first place? I understand that sometimes emails aren't always getting through for some reason, and it isn't Chris's doing. --[[User:Anaconda|Anaconda]] 07:39, 28 November 2009 (CET)
:When I wrote that, he hadn't moved all the E-mails he had deleted into the Rejected mailbag.  As of right now, he still hasn't added the Deleted e-mails from mailbag 2.  So I was trying to say that there are some e-mails he just plain eliminates without putting in the rejected mailbag.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 14:36, 28 November 2009 (CET)
::Oh. There should be a section for those on here. --[[User:Anaconda|Anaconda]] 21:32, 28 November 2009 (CET)
*As I understood, WikiSysop would filter the e-mails, post ones they like, then Chris would filter those. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 21:52, 28 November 2009 (CET)
:*In other words, Chris filters out the ones that require more than a yes or no answer. --[[User:CrassCrab|The Great Wizard CrassCrab, Lord of the Seven Realm and Master of the Archane Black Arts of the Eleventh Trans-Dimensional Vortex]] 16:50, 30 November 2009 (CET)
== Autism Mailbag ==
It looks like Chris has created a new permanent section to drop all the 'Aspergers isn't Alzheimer's' posts into. Classic. I've put the one solitary message that is there at the minute under this heading, rather than as an independent post, for the time being. All the best, --[[User:Elke|Elke]] 03:30, 3 December 2009 (CET)
*I don't know where else to post this, but, has anyone seen that disgusting wall of text Chris spent 5 hours writing that basically states all Aspies are liars and autism is the only ture autism, because they have the same name? That shit deserves an article.--[[User:Sonichuistehcool|Sonichuistehcool]] 04:47, 5 December 2009 (CET)
==I hope I don't get banned for this==
I talked about this a little on [[Talk:Mailbag#Oh no the mailbags are a mess!|Mailbag talk page]], but I don't think anybody read that except anaconda.  Basically we've had multiple copies of all the letters Chris didn't want to respond to on the Cwcki.
In an effort to reduce redundancy, I altered the mailbag template so that it had links to every letter Chris ever rejected, meaning you can still find Rejected letters with relative ease.  I did the same for Autism, and then cleared out this page, and tried to make it a little more article-like.  Every e-mail Chris rejected is still on the Cwcki, they're just sorted on their appropriate mailbag pages.
I personally think this is the best possible system, but if I've stepped out of line, please let me know.  Thanks a lot --[[User:Beat|Beat]] 06:29, 7 December 2009 (CET)

Latest revision as of 03:49, 3 January 2010

"It should be understood that Chris does not actually place all the e-mails he deletes in the rejected mailbox. As of this writing, many of the messages Chris has deleted have not been recorded on this page." Are you talking about ones that were posted and just deleted off the main page, or ones that didn't get through in the first place? I understand that sometimes emails aren't always getting through for some reason, and it isn't Chris's doing. --Anaconda 07:39, 28 November 2009 (CET)

When I wrote that, he hadn't moved all the E-mails he had deleted into the Rejected mailbag. As of right now, he still hasn't added the Deleted e-mails from mailbag 2. So I was trying to say that there are some e-mails he just plain eliminates without putting in the rejected mailbag.--Beat 14:36, 28 November 2009 (CET)
Oh. There should be a section for those on here. --Anaconda 21:32, 28 November 2009 (CET)
  • As I understood, WikiSysop would filter the e-mails, post ones they like, then Chris would filter those. --Champthom 21:52, 28 November 2009 (CET)

Autism Mailbag

It looks like Chris has created a new permanent section to drop all the 'Aspergers isn't Alzheimer's' posts into. Classic. I've put the one solitary message that is there at the minute under this heading, rather than as an independent post, for the time being. All the best, --Elke 03:30, 3 December 2009 (CET)

  • I don't know where else to post this, but, has anyone seen that disgusting wall of text Chris spent 5 hours writing that basically states all Aspies are liars and autism is the only ture autism, because they have the same name? That shit deserves an article.--Sonichuistehcool 04:47, 5 December 2009 (CET)

I hope I don't get banned for this

I talked about this a little on Mailbag talk page, but I don't think anybody read that except anaconda. Basically we've had multiple copies of all the letters Chris didn't want to respond to on the Cwcki.

In an effort to reduce redundancy, I altered the mailbag template so that it had links to every letter Chris ever rejected, meaning you can still find Rejected letters with relative ease. I did the same for Autism, and then cleared out this page, and tried to make it a little more article-like. Every e-mail Chris rejected is still on the Cwcki, they're just sorted on their appropriate mailbag pages.

I personally think this is the best possible system, but if I've stepped out of line, please let me know. Thanks a lot --Beat 06:29, 7 December 2009 (CET)