Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sonichu 0"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: To do: #Edit synopis for each episode, add more commentary. #Scrape more Issue 0 pics into gallery (there's a lot in other articles) Putting all Issue 0 pics into the gallery ensures tha...)
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


Putting all Issue 0 pics into the gallery ensures that when somebody clicks a pic in another article, they get a reference back to Issue 0 on the image page.  --[[User:Dude|Dude]] 20:48, 12 December 2009 (CET)
Putting all Issue 0 pics into the gallery ensures that when somebody clicks a pic in another article, they get a reference back to Issue 0 on the image page.  --[[User:Dude|Dude]] 20:48, 12 December 2009 (CET)
== Sonichu site ==
For some reason, Firefox considers the Sonichu site on 110mb an attack site. Can anyone confirm if it is malicious at all? --[[User:BreadGod|BreadGod]] 16:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
:No, not for me. Then again, Firefox is completely picky. That, or it knows about the whole "hotlink it, you're getting a virus" deal...--[[User:Blazer|Blazer]] 17:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:10, 2 June 2010

To do:

  1. Edit synopis for each episode, add more commentary.
  2. Scrape more Issue 0 pics into gallery (there's a lot in other articles)

Putting all Issue 0 pics into the gallery ensures that when somebody clicks a pic in another article, they get a reference back to Issue 0 on the image page. --Dude 20:48, 12 December 2009 (CET)

Sonichu site

For some reason, Firefox considers the Sonichu site on 110mb an attack site. Can anyone confirm if it is malicious at all? --BreadGod 16:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

No, not for me. Then again, Firefox is completely picky. That, or it knows about the whole "hotlink it, you're getting a virus" deal...--Blazer 17:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)