Difference between revisions of "Talk:Attraction images"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I really think these images should just be categorized as Attraction Images and a comment made about them on the category description. --~~~~) |
m (2 revisions) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I really think these images should just be categorized as Attraction Images and a comment made about them on the category description. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:57, 9 August 2009 (CEST) | I really think these images should just be categorized as Attraction Images and a comment made about them on the category description. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 06:57, 9 August 2009 (CEST) | ||
*Fair enough. I created the page because I felt they were notable enough to warrant one. Chris continues to use these for his love quest and they are frequently referred to. --[[User:Delabonte|Delabonte]] 06:24, 11 August 2009 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:58, 3 January 2010
I really think these images should just be categorized as Attraction Images and a comment made about them on the category description. --Champthom 06:57, 9 August 2009 (CEST)
- Fair enough. I created the page because I felt they were notable enough to warrant one. Chris continues to use these for his love quest and they are frequently referred to. --Delabonte 06:24, 11 August 2009 (CEST)