Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dkd"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Da update) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Great. That probably does explain how Chris has failed to mmention him all this time | Great. That probably does explain how Chris has failed to mmention him all this time | ||
[[User:Dkd|Dkd]] 16:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Dkd|Dkd]] 16:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Da update == | |||
Gonna not re-add crap that's already been removed 100 times from da update? We have a link to the prank call in the top line already. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 09:13, 24 September 2010 (PDT) | |||
:[http://www.cogsdev.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Da_update&curid=489&diff=115475&oldid=115392 Your diff] readded crap that was removed some time ago. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 09:18, 24 September 2010 (PDT) | |||
it was there when I hit save changes, and I didnt get the "the page was changed since your last edit". looks like a screw up with the server then[[User:Dkd|Dkd]] 09:40, 24 September 2010 (PDT) | |||
:You probably started editing from an older diff. The article hadn't been touched in 13 hours. --[[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] 09:42, 24 September 2010 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 11:42, 24 September 2010
Proof of Life
Erm, I think it was IRC I got it from. There was sauce, but I forget where. Apologies. I do know better than to quote sans source normally though :) --YawningSquirtleRedux 00:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm a lumber jack and I'm quite OK
Great. That probably does explain how Chris has failed to mmention him all this time Dkd 16:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Da update
Gonna not re-add crap that's already been removed 100 times from da update? We have a link to the prank call in the top line already. --Anonymax 09:13, 24 September 2010 (PDT)
it was there when I hit save changes, and I didnt get the "the page was changed since your last edit". looks like a screw up with the server thenDkd 09:40, 24 September 2010 (PDT)
- You probably started editing from an older diff. The article hadn't been touched in 13 hours. --Anonymax 09:42, 24 September 2010 (PDT)