Difference between revisions of "CWCki talk:Banned Users"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created.) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
So yeah, Champ asked and I made it. Additions/corrections/etc are more than welcome- I don't recognise many of the names on the list, so feel free to add in more details. I'd recommend we keep it slightly-brief in order to prevent glory seekers/namefags. | So yeah, Champ asked and I made it. Additions/corrections/etc are more than welcome- I don't recognise many of the names on the list, so feel free to add in more details. I'd recommend we keep it slightly-brief in order to prevent glory seekers/namefags. | ||
== Um... == | |||
I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:50, 16 July 2010
Page Created
So yeah, Champ asked and I made it. Additions/corrections/etc are more than welcome- I don't recognise many of the names on the list, so feel free to add in more details. I'd recommend we keep it slightly-brief in order to prevent glory seekers/namefags.
Um...
I don't know about this. Shouldn't we put down the reasons for banning specifically rather than their whole background? For example, 16BitAlex I don't think needs that much elaboration. I think "Banned at his own request" would be adequate. Also, having just looked over records, CrescentSkunk was actually banned for inserting false information into pages. --Edward 15:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)