Difference between revisions of "Talk:November 2009"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==relevancy== so, /cwc/ has apparently died. i know it didn't have PVCC-esque infamy, but it was still a pretty fun board. so, my question is, should we add the site's demise to the novem...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
so, /cwc/ has apparently died. i know it didn't have PVCC-esque infamy, but it was still a pretty fun board. so, my question is, should we add the site's demise to the november timeline? in fairness, we do mention shit like Gay4Sonichu and Sonichu Girls being founded, the creation of the new CWCki, and the creation of the chronology etc --[[User:Jump|Jump]] 23:19, 4 November 2009 (CET) | so, /cwc/ has apparently died. i know it didn't have PVCC-esque infamy, but it was still a pretty fun board. so, my question is, should we add the site's demise to the november timeline? in fairness, we do mention shit like Gay4Sonichu and Sonichu Girls being founded, the creation of the new CWCki, and the creation of the chronology etc --[[User:Jump|Jump]] 23:19, 4 November 2009 (CET) | ||
*/cwc/ will be back in action asap. I guess we can add an entry like "/cwc/ back afer an outage of a week" when it returns... [[User:RachmaninovDESU|RachmaninovDESU]] 23:27, 4 November 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 17:27, 4 November 2009
relevancy
so, /cwc/ has apparently died. i know it didn't have PVCC-esque infamy, but it was still a pretty fun board. so, my question is, should we add the site's demise to the november timeline? in fairness, we do mention shit like Gay4Sonichu and Sonichu Girls being founded, the creation of the new CWCki, and the creation of the chronology etc --Jump 23:19, 4 November 2009 (CET)
- /cwc/ will be back in action asap. I guess we can add an entry like "/cwc/ back afer an outage of a week" when it returns... RachmaninovDESU 23:27, 4 November 2009 (CET)