Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Stub"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Proposed new stub template) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<center><div class="boilerplate metadata" id="stub"><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:transparent; border:3px outset #228B22"><tr><td>[[Image:Stub.JPG|100px]]</td><td>'' This article is very short. You can help CWCki by [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} expanding it]''.</td></tr></table></div><includeonly>[[Category:Stubs<noinclude>|</noinclude>]]</includeonly></center> | <center><div class="boilerplate metadata" id="stub"><table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:transparent; border:3px outset #228B22"><tr><td>[[Image:Stub.JPG|100px]]</td><td>'' This article is very short. You can help CWCki by [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} expanding it]''.</td></tr></table></div><includeonly>[[Category:Stubs<noinclude>|</noinclude>]]</includeonly></center> | ||
Thoughts? | Thoughts? --[[User:Great Briton|Great Briton]] 21:28, 29 July 2009 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 29 July 2009
Proposed new stub template
I don't think the current stub template's all that great. It just says the article sucks, when instead it should convey an article's brevity. There can be stubs that don't suck, and long articles that do suck, so they're two different things. Anyway, I quickly gimped an image and knocked up a possible new template, see below.
 | This article is very short. You can help CWCki by expanding it. |
Thoughts? --Great Briton 21:28, 29 July 2009 (CEST)