Difference between revisions of "Talk:Response to ADF"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
InvalidLogin (talk | contribs) (ed" */) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Actually, Leviticus only condemns male homosexuality. Lesbians are... conspicuously never mentioned, to my knowledge. Maybe so the Old Testament wouldn't give women ideas. :p - [[User:LucidFox|LucidFox]] 20:48, 29 August 2011 (PDT) | Actually, Leviticus only condemns male homosexuality. Lesbians are... conspicuously never mentioned, to my knowledge. Maybe so the Old Testament wouldn't give women ideas. :p - [[User:LucidFox|LucidFox]] 20:48, 29 August 2011 (PDT) | ||
* Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read [http://kingjbible.com/romans/1.htm Romans 1:26-27] "''For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.''" Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - [[User:InvalidLogin|InvalidLogin]] 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:12, 29 August 2011
I have to get ready for work but this needs to be more wikified, plus the intro paragraph seems to be kinda clunky, any chance it could be split up into a few separate paragraphs?--Champthom 18:01, 29 August 2011 (PDT)
"That bit in the bible where lesbians are specifically condemned"
Actually, Leviticus only condemns male homosexuality. Lesbians are... conspicuously never mentioned, to my knowledge. Maybe so the Old Testament wouldn't give women ideas. :p - LucidFox 20:48, 29 August 2011 (PDT)
- Leviticus, yes, but that's not the only part where homosexuality is condemned in the bible. Read Romans 1:26-27 "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet." Vague, yes, it could be talking about anal sex or fisting for all we know but it's generally interpreted as the only text where lesbians are specifically condemned. - InvalidLogin 21:12, 29 August 2011 (PDT)