Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scale of Respect"
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
*Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST) | *Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!rowspan=4 width=5px style="background: #000055;"| | |||
!colspan=10 align=center style="background: #000000; color:#FFFFFF;"|SCALE OF RESPECT, some nicer colours for this cell would be great | |||
!rowspan=4 width=5px style="background: #550000;"| | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:#0000FF; color:#FFFFFF;"|1 | |||
|style="background:#1C00E3; color:#FFFFFF;"|2 | |||
|style="background:#3900C6; color:#FFFFFF;"|3 | |||
|style="background:#5500AA; color:#FFFFFF;"|4 | |||
|style="background:#71008E; color:#FFFFFF;"|5 | |||
|style="background:#8E0071; color:#FFFFFF;"|6 | |||
|style="background:#AA0055; color:#FFFFFF;"|7 | |||
|style="background:#C60039; color:#FFFFFF;"|8 | |||
|style="background:#E3001C; color:#FFFFFF;"|9 | |||
|style="background:#FF0000; color:#FFFFFF;"|10 | |||
|- | |||
|style="background:#000033; color:#00FFFF;"|Trolls<br/>4-cent Garbage Employees | |||
|style="background:#06002D; color:#1CFFE3;"|Satan | |||
|style="background:#0B0028; color:#39FFC6;"|Mary Lee Walsh<br/>Wes Iseli<br/>Jason Kendrick Howell<br/>ScotPallazo | |||
|style="background:#110022; color:#55FFAA;"|Jerkops<br/>Manajerks | |||
|style="background:#17001C; color:#71FF8E;"|Non-Single Men | |||
|style="background:#1C0017; color:#8EFF71;"|Buddies<br/>Average Single Men | |||
|style="background:#220011; color:#AAFF55;"|Gal-Pals<br/>Family Members<br/>Boyfriend-free girls | |||
|style="background:#28000B; color:#C6FF39;"|Bob Chandler<br/>The President of the United States | |||
|style="background:#2D0006; color:#E3FF1C;"|Barbara Chandler | |||
|style="background:#330000; color:#FFFF00;"|Christian Weston Chandler | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=10 align=center style="background: #000000; color:#FFFFFF;"|bottom text, remove row if not needed. remember to lower the rowspan of the side cells by 1 each if you do. | |||
|} | |||
had some fun with formatting, as you can see. the text colours, as well as the top and bottom boxes, could do with a little work. [http://websitetips.com/colortools/colorblender/ this] will probably help if you want to change the colours. i'm not entirely satisfied with the borders either. try removing the wikitable bit and hitting preview. WILD. --[[User:Cogsdev|cogsdev/vedsgoc]] 09:40, 7 December 2009 (CET) | |||
==Congratulations to CrassCrab== | ==Congratulations to CrassCrab== | ||
His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET) | His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET) |
Revision as of 04:40, 7 December 2009
Could someone make a drawing for this? Normally I wouldn't consider this worthy of an entire article but it's something fucked up Chris thought of to deal with social interactions that it's worthy to focus on. I think it could use a picture though. --Champthom 22:09, 8 June 2009 (CEST)
- I did a small table, showing what the Scale of Respect theoretically could look like. Everyone, please edit it if you think certain things are wrong. Also add people who I may have forgotten. In the end someone could whip out a decent looking graph in MS paint or whatever. It will be cool. RachmaninovDESU 20:24, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
- Fuck you, Champthom, with your funny but not factual. ^^ But srsly, if you wanted a picture, how would that suddenly be "factual"? Or were you just referring to a funny illustrative picture...
Points | People who fall into this category |
---|---|
10. Respect. | Christian Weston Chandler |
9. | God; Jesus |
8. | Barbara Chandler |
7. | Bob Chandler; The President of the United States |
6. | Gal-Pals; Family Members; Boyfriend-free girls |
5. | Buddies; Average Single Men |
4. | Non-Single Men |
3. | Jerkops; Manajerks |
2. | Mary Lee Walsh; Wes Iseli; Jason Kendrick Howell; ScotPallazo |
1. | Satan |
0. No respect. | Trolls; 4-cent Garbage Employees |
Check it out now. RachmaninovDESU 20:27, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
- I was thinking just a 1 to 10 point bar, like:
1 ───────────────────────────────── 10 (Respect)
No
Respect
With like, 1 being blue and 10 being hot red, sorta like a thermometer but on the side. I have no idea how to do it in MS Paint (because I'm not 133t enough to use Photoshop and I suck at GIMP) but that would be a way to illustrate it with it still being factual. --Champthom 20:45, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
- Finally thought of it - like the old "Hot or Not"? scale. --Champthom 22:43, 24 June 2009 (CEST)
SCALE OF RESPECT, some nicer colours for this cell would be great | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
Trolls 4-cent Garbage Employees |
Satan | Mary Lee Walsh Wes Iseli Jason Kendrick Howell ScotPallazo |
Jerkops Manajerks |
Non-Single Men | Buddies Average Single Men |
Gal-Pals Family Members Boyfriend-free girls |
Bob Chandler The President of the United States |
Barbara Chandler | Christian Weston Chandler | ||
bottom text, remove row if not needed. remember to lower the rowspan of the side cells by 1 each if you do. |
had some fun with formatting, as you can see. the text colours, as well as the top and bottom boxes, could do with a little work. this will probably help if you want to change the colours. i'm not entirely satisfied with the borders either. try removing the wikitable bit and hitting preview. WILD. --cogsdev/vedsgoc 09:40, 7 December 2009 (CET)
Congratulations to CrassCrab
His section, though sounds a bit too much "analysis," relates Chris to psychological developments and thus doesn't totally suck. Perhaps cite these studies though and maybe retitle the section to something other than "The Concept."--Champthom 08:54, 7 December 2009 (CET)