Difference between revisions of "Talk:The GAMe PLACe"
(New section: Arguing with kids) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I'm really curious about this argument Chris had with these kids. The details are a little vague at the moment. [[User:Glorious Tentacularity|Glorious Tentacularity]] 10:00, 14 November 2009 (CET) | I'm really curious about this argument Chris had with these kids. The details are a little vague at the moment. [[User:Glorious Tentacularity|Glorious Tentacularity]] 10:00, 14 November 2009 (CET) | ||
*I don't think it was one time, just a general pattern of Chris arguing. Anyone with a PVCC account, start posting the Q&As from that thread with Lucas and Mimms onto [[Lucas and Mimms Q&A|this page]]. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 15:07, 14 November 2009 (CET) |
Revision as of 09:07, 14 November 2009
To do
- Chris's comments on his days at the Game Place
- why he got banned
- picture that was taken at Game Place
Novices
Does anyone else think that before going behind the counter the manager Micheal Schnider probably wanted to get rid of him due to his attitude towards the younger players there. Since he was complaining he got paired up with novices when he was a volunteer "gym leader", which back when there was a TCG league in my town the UK(6-8 years ago) I can remember it was part of "gym leaders" responsibilities to assist members of the TCG league and teach them the rules and such.
It would be bad for store if they had a slight figure of authority(Chris) there being a jerkass to the younger children who want to learn how to play the card game better. Knowing Chris he was probably battling the newcomers and rather than practice battles where you would guide them step by step on an equal level(e.g. In his position I would have an extra,weaker deck like a starter deck so I don't win regardless and not play to my best ability) he probably used his best deck and played all-out, discouraging newer players.(Drlugae 22:10, 18 March 2009 (CET))
- As he considers 8 year olds to be equal competition, I'd say that would be correct yes. Him going behind the counter was probably the straw that broke the camels back more than anything. But we'll see if they want him back or not.--UncleBastard 22:18, 18 March 2009 (CET)
- That could be a factor, but I think the main reason they got rid of him was because he was acting as an employee. He thought he could get behind the counter and do shit, while he was actually just being used as a gym guy. Being an ass to kids isn't really a reason to ban people, but I do think you are right to some extent. I wouldn't want Chris having any power in my cardshop if I owned one...
- Besides that, the fact he took his mom to the store to question people must have really ticked michael off. He was also starting to use hard-core lines against Mimms, like "that's something you didn't know about this Chan before, right?" Game-shop employees are usually underpayed and quite sad, so I don't think they want to have to deal with autistic shit like this...RachmaninovDESU 22:23, 18 March 2009 (CET)
Arguing with kids
I'm really curious about this argument Chris had with these kids. The details are a little vague at the moment. Glorious Tentacularity 10:00, 14 November 2009 (CET)