Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 29"

Revision as of 11:21, 31 December 2009

Why, hello there, let me get back to you on that.--Beat 16:19, 31 December 2009 (CET)

I love the idea of this mailbag, but isn't it problematic to re-post the Evan e-mail when Chris and Evan actually have had further correspondence since then? Llort 17:01, 31 December 2009 (CET)

I don't see why we should skip the opportunity to have Chris whine about something. Besides, he's in a rush to answer those questions. I guess it's less "stressful" to answers questions with one-liners than drawing his crappy comic or ending his Christmas story. So I have no problem with out-of-sync (or even repeated) inquiries. Griffintown 17:21, 31 December 2009 (CET)

Revision as of 11:01, 31 December 2009 (view source) VanKrause (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:21, 31 December 2009 (view source) VanKrause (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:*I love the idea of this mailbag, but isn't it problematic to re-post the Evan e-mail when Chris and Evan actually have had further correspondence since then? [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 17:01, 31 December 2009 (CET)		:*I love the idea of this mailbag, but isn't it problematic to re-post the Evan e-mail when Chris and Evan actually have had further correspondence since then? [[User:Llort\|Llort]] 17:01, 31 December 2009 (CET)
			::*I don't see why we should skip the opportunity to have Chris whine about something. Besides, he's in a rush to answer those questions. I guess it's less "stressful" to answers questions with one-liners than drawing his crappy comic or ending his Christmas story. So I have no problem with out-of-sync (or even repeated) inquiries. [[User:Griffintown\|Griffintown]] 17:21, 31 December 2009 (CET)