Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Infobox/video"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:


*Oh snap, I didn't think of that... I guess, we should go by the CWCki standart DAY MONTH YEAR, just to play it safe.--[[User:NeoShadow|NeoShadow]] 19:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
*Oh snap, I didn't think of that... I guess, we should go by the CWCki standart DAY MONTH YEAR, just to play it safe.--[[User:NeoShadow|NeoShadow]] 19:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
*Mmmmmkay.  Seems reasonable enough.
==i fuckin this template==
==i fuckin this template==
It's p. awesome, good job. --[[User:Sonichuis44|Sonichuis44]] 19:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
It's p. awesome, good job. --[[User:Sonichuis44|Sonichuis44]] 19:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:58, 4 January 2010

So is this eventually going to be on all the videos or what? Xentrilus 17:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


Dating

This is a bit of a problem. The majority of the completed infoboxes use the dating format: MONTH DAY, YEAR. AFAIK this goes against the CWCki standard. Now IMO this wouldn't be that big of an issue, provided EVERY infobox used this format, but the thing is some of the infoboxes use the format DAY MONTH YEAR.

Before we go ANY further, we need to decide which one we should be using. Otherwise it could lead to quite a bit of extremely tedious work.

tl;dr, HALP WHAT DO WE DO. Xentrilus 19:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Oh snap, I didn't think of that... I guess, we should go by the CWCki standart DAY MONTH YEAR, just to play it safe.--NeoShadow 19:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Mmmmmkay. Seems reasonable enough.

i fuckin this template

It's p. awesome, good job. --Sonichuis44 19:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)