Difference between revisions of "Talk:Down with Asperchu"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
But there's none of that going on.. it's just Chris slightly raising his voice to make a death threat. Then there are other underwhelming videos that are categorized as "Videos with RAGE" too.. I feel like this recognition is starting to become bastardized.
But there's none of that going on.. it's just Chris slightly raising his voice to make a death threat. Then there are other underwhelming videos that are categorized as "Videos with RAGE" too.. I feel like this recognition is starting to become bastardized.


The point being, I suggest the rage template be removed, and the massive font be returned to its original size.
The point being, I suggest the rage template be removed, and the massive font be returned to its original size. Does everyone else agree?
--[[User:Shogun|Shogun]] 04:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:Shogun|Shogun]] 04:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)



Revision as of 23:40, 10 January 2010

This video: You rage you ruse -Briscoe 7:30 PM, January 9th 2010

I was seriously about to start transcripting it when somebody else began doing it.

Doin a rough transcribing, feel free to tweak it up when I finish. Done with a rough transcript, feel free to tweak it up with format, links, w/e. And yes, I put in the "fat fiction" part on purpose because it seriously sounds like he's saying that. ShotgunJones 03:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

This? High levels of TARD RAGE?

The template should only be reserved for Chris going on a huge mental breakdown. I had high hopes when I first saw the page with this template and this massive font in the transcript, seeing it as it is probably a new video where Chris goes ape shit, just like he did in Take that Page down NOW and CHRIS!! CHANDLER!!.

But there's none of that going on.. it's just Chris slightly raising his voice to make a death threat. Then there are other underwhelming videos that are categorized as "Videos with RAGE" too.. I feel like this recognition is starting to become bastardized.

The point being, I suggest the rage template be removed, and the massive font be returned to its original size. Does everyone else agree? --Shogun 04:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Clyde saga

lolwut? Really, this isn't part of any particular saga though an Asperchu saga may arise...--Champthom 04:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Agreed, but do you think we should make like a CWCipedia or Jack saga, too? --CWCAttack 05:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed new page

Now that he's been mentioned in a video (and likely will be in future videos), as well as having created something notable (Asperchu), should Alec Benson Leary get his own page? --Raikonos 06:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

  • No, at this point I think it's more logical to put the stuff about him in the Asperchu article. --ThatMan 06:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Speaking of pages, may someone change the title of this page to "Down With Asperchu!!!"? --CWCAttack 19:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Death threats

Is it me, or is Chris way too trigger happy with his death-threats lately? Ich bin schwul, Lynxr. Ich bin schwul. 08:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Indeed he is. Seems to make some kind of sense to me though. Chris is getting built up by having his own website organised for him and receiving constant mailbags kissing his ass and inquiring about his life. With the increased attention comes increased delusions of power. --Hayate666 11:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  • There's also his "Psychic" powers up to play. If he believe that he can curse someone at distance, what about killing them? Griffintown 16:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  • I wonder if he really believes in the Death Note ShotgunJones 16:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)