Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 42"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Da-zen-man (talk | contribs) |
(→NO U) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==NO U== | ==NO U== | ||
It seems Chris thinks NO U! will deflect all of his problems criticized. That, and how does someone asking Chris a question mean they too have the same problem? I would think all the arguments he gets in with Bob would mean he could debate a little better. --[[User:Da-zen-man|Da-zen-man]] 06:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | It seems Chris thinks NO U! will deflect all of his problems criticized. That, and how does someone asking Chris a question mean they too have the same problem? I would think all the arguments he gets in with Bob would mean he could debate a little better. --[[User:Da-zen-man|Da-zen-man]] 06:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, the immediate assumption that the guy was a virgin who lived in a room full of toys and crap was kinda weird. I mean, it's Chris we're talking about, but this is grasping at straws.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 06:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:09, 21 January 2010
Low resolution and blocky style
When Chris latches onto a phrase, he commits! Anyway, it's obvious this is his new stock phrase to describe Asperchu.--Beat 05:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
NO U
It seems Chris thinks NO U! will deflect all of his problems criticized. That, and how does someone asking Chris a question mean they too have the same problem? I would think all the arguments he gets in with Bob would mean he could debate a little better. --Da-zen-man 06:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, the immediate assumption that the guy was a virgin who lived in a room full of toys and crap was kinda weird. I mean, it's Chris we're talking about, but this is grasping at straws.--Beat 06:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)