Difference between revisions of "Talk:Laughs Under Lucricities"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Phlegethon (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. [[User:Llort|Llort]] 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. [[User:Llort|Llort]] 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | :* I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in [[Mailbag 48]] and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-[[User:Phlegethon|Phlegethon]] 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Edited article to reflect this. --[[User:DStecks|DStecks]] 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:59, 2 March 2010
TRUE and HONEST origins of "lucrid"
Did Chris himself ever say that "laughs under lucricities" was equivalent to "laughs under lucrativeness"? If so, I don't recall. In any case, I really don't think that "lucrid" was derived from "lucid" (meaning "clear"), as this page currently implies. If anything, "lucrid" was derived from "lurid" (meaning "revolting"). Honestly, one of my favorite things about CWCki is how many editors here make fun of Chris's "tenuous grasp on the English language" when they are themselves just barely literate. Llort 15:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think that theory's likely. Chris called something a "lucrid defiance of a drawing" in Mailbag 48 and "lurid" might make sense in that context.-Phlegethon 17:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Edited article to reflect this. --DStecks 02:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)