Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pokémon"
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It implied that he tossed all of Gen IV into discontinuity out of spite. The new Rosechu page implies that her father was a Luxray(Which makes sense, it's in the same Egg group as Raichu).--[[User:MoarLurk|MoarLurk]] 04:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | It implied that he tossed all of Gen IV into discontinuity out of spite. The new Rosechu page implies that her father was a Luxray(Which makes sense, it's in the same Egg group as Raichu).--[[User:MoarLurk|MoarLurk]] 04:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Yeah. So why was that paragraph removed? Thats what i'm asking. It seemed like it was relevant information, but some editor deleted it, and I want to know why. --[[User:Edward|Edward]] 19:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:36, 19 February 2010
Right, first of all, why was that little paragraph about Chris rejecting the pokemon games as cannon for Sonichu's sake deleted? Because it seemed to be relevant information. Just asking. Also, Chris has given lists of pokemon used by people such as Naitsirhc on CWCipedia articles. I'm not quite sure, but I think that these Trainers teams warrant a little subsection of some kind. Also he mentioned that Naitsirhc had a Mewtwo, which may or may not be the same one that 'raised' Magi-Chan. Thats definitely getting a mention. --Edward 04:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
It implied that he tossed all of Gen IV into discontinuity out of spite. The new Rosechu page implies that her father was a Luxray(Which makes sense, it's in the same Egg group as Raichu).--MoarLurk 04:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Yeah. So why was that paragraph removed? Thats what i'm asking. It seemed like it was relevant information, but some editor deleted it, and I want to know why. --Edward 19:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)