Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mailbag 56"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? [[User:Xentrilus|Xentrilus]] 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:15, 20 February 2010
OH SHIT MIKE JACKSON JR.--Beat 05:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
There seems to be a slight inconsistency in Jr.'s letter. He says that Chris's canned response left his mother catatonic for DAYS...yet, said canned response was only delivered yesterday.Never mind, I get it. Chris probably won't get around to MB56 for a few more days anyway. So when he DOES eventually read Jr.'s message, the times will match up. That is...diabolically clever, assuming it was even intentional. Xentrilus 11:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)- I wouldn't expect a response to MB56 for at least a couple of weeks. Liquid! 13:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Oh boy, Chris half-assed the response, I can't wait for Mike's reply.--MoarLurk 04:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Oh christ, now we know why Chris half-assed the Mike Jackson responses. "Michael Jackson..." Dammit, I can't believe I didn't catch that. Does this mean he's wising up to the mailbag references? Xentrilus 05:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- Mike Jackson's pretty goddamn obvious. I don't think he initially caught it though. I'm pretty sure the first time he was actually referred to as "Michale" was in his grieving widow's letter, and that threw him off.--Beat 05:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)