Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Split Off"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or t…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or trimming the article." Personally I prefer this one but I think this one is a bit too wordy and needs a more concise explanation of what's going on. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or trimming the article." Personally I prefer this one but I think this one is a bit too wordy and needs a more concise explanation of what's going on. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Oh, and the joke for the other one is that there's that pic of Barb, hence the "too large" theme. But personally, it looks like shit compared to this one. --[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:59, 4 April 2010
We already have a template like this, we just never use it. The closest one that comes to mind is something along the lines of "This article is too large, consider splitting or trimming the article." Personally I prefer this one but I think this one is a bit too wordy and needs a more concise explanation of what's going on. --Champthom 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, and the joke for the other one is that there's that pic of Barb, hence the "too large" theme. But personally, it looks like shit compared to this one. --Champthom 16:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)