Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lovely Weather"
m (1 revision) |
Needlepants (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Maybe discuss the implications of him traveling into the future and then meeting his wife after he came back as ruining the laws of time as allowing it to affect his future, undermining free will. Maybe something about how this relates to the theory of time inevitability (see some episode of Doctor Who and also popularized in The Twilight Zone).--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 14:25, 22 December 2009 (CET) | Maybe discuss the implications of him traveling into the future and then meeting his wife after he came back as ruining the laws of time as allowing it to affect his future, undermining free will. Maybe something about how this relates to the theory of time inevitability (see some episode of Doctor Who and also popularized in The Twilight Zone).--[[User:Champthom|Champthom]] 14:25, 22 December 2009 (CET) | ||
This whole thing is creepily similar to a <strike>ronery nerd fantasy involving a MILF and a 18 to [my age] boyfriend-free-girl</strike> thought experiment I had once, except both people fully knew that the other is from another time, etc. etc.. The entire question was basically: If you travel to the future and have sex with your future spouse, whom you had met in the present and were involved with (either romantically, sexually, or both), but not yet married them: Is that adultery? | |||
I have a point here: In Chris' skull, he hasn't had sex 'outside' of marriage, because he's done his future wife, and in the time period his future-self is married to her. The fact that present-Chris hadn't even met her is irrelevant. I just need a less confusing way to word that. -- [[User:Needlepants|Needlepants]] 04:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:37, 6 January 2010
We have a picture of her now, Chris has discussed her and his traveling into the future and having sex with her as being not rape, in addition to her significance (the Bride of Chris) can warrant her own article now.
Maybe discuss the implications of him traveling into the future and then meeting his wife after he came back as ruining the laws of time as allowing it to affect his future, undermining free will. Maybe something about how this relates to the theory of time inevitability (see some episode of Doctor Who and also popularized in The Twilight Zone).--Champthom 14:25, 22 December 2009 (CET)
This whole thing is creepily similar to a ronery nerd fantasy involving a MILF and a 18 to [my age] boyfriend-free-girl thought experiment I had once, except both people fully knew that the other is from another time, etc. etc.. The entire question was basically: If you travel to the future and have sex with your future spouse, whom you had met in the present and were involved with (either romantically, sexually, or both), but not yet married them: Is that adultery?
I have a point here: In Chris' skull, he hasn't had sex 'outside' of marriage, because he's done his future wife, and in the time period his future-self is married to her. The fact that present-Chris hadn't even met her is irrelevant. I just need a less confusing way to word that. -- Needlepants 04:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)