Difference between revisions of "User talk:Clydec"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 55: Line 55:


== Thanks. ==
== Thanks. ==
I really appreciate what you've done to help me and all. I've been working for over a month now to retrieve my userpage and to be honest I was quite surprised to see how fast he and his personal army sprang back up to trash it again. But anyway thank you for you help, Clyde. I am in your debt.--[[User:EdtheHedgehog1894|EdtheHedgehog1894]] 10:17, 25 April 2010 (EST)
I really appreciate what you've done to help me and all. I've been working for over a month now to retrieve my userpage and to be honest I was quite surprised to see how fast he and his personal army sprang back up to trash it again. But anyway thank you for you assistance, Clyde. I am in your debt.--[[User:EdtheHedgehog1894|EdtheHedgehog1894]] 10:17, 25 April 2010 (EST)

Revision as of 09:19, 25 April 2010

Clyde, I must hand it to you, you have turned CWCki into a respectable looking wiki. I salute you. --Champthom 06:24, 11 March 2009 (CET)

For your work making CWCki like a respectable wiki, it's CWCki's highest honor (at least, that I've made up):


Pickle Order of the Pickle
This user has performed selfless service above and beyond the call of duty for the glorious Motherland.

Good work, Clyde, we salute you. --Champthom 04:36, 16 March 2009 (CET)

And good job blocking Grawp.--Champthom 16:49, 17 March 2009 (CET)

Miyamoto Saga

I added a page for the Miyamoto Saga e-mails. I normally don't feel comfortable personally involved in trolling to editing pages in regards to themselves but since you were personally involved in this, I feel you could clarify the context and dates and such of the e-mails in question. I believe you said you don't have the sent e-mails but I believe you could at least provide the context of Chris's responses. --Champthom 10:03, 23 March 2009 (CET)

  • tell me which ones you want me to clarify and i'll attempt to do so and now i'm off to sleep almost Clydec 10:11, 23 March 2009 (CET)
    • You don't have to do it right away, but just clarify what you asked that prompted the responses, the general timeframe of these e-mails (some are obvious, like the hackings that someone like myself could clarify, but others are somewhat subtle), how you agreed to reimburse him, stuff like that. Just take a look when you have the chance and add whatever necessary commentary from your point of view as Miyamoto. --Champthom 10:25, 23 March 2009 (CET)

Yo

Quick reflexes there on that "lock your door faggot". --Fuckingstupid 22:51, 1 October 2009 (CEST)

WHAT

you is alive?! but you are dead bro and were are fighting the evil boss. LStaley416 04:27, 15 October 2009 (CEST)

Future of trolling

I was wondering what your opinion was on the direction Chris-trolling is going. What do you think of the biography Xentrilus and his team are working on? Does trolling Chris sometimes cause him more good than harm, especially recently? (example: Jack Thaddeus tells Chris to get exercise in the recent phone call) Sorry if these are newfag questions, but I figured 95% of what you get must be "HEY WILL U BE MAH BRO??" and "IF U R DEAD THEN WHO WAS PHONE??" in which case I'd probably be safe. Anyways, thanks for reading my questions. --fabrosi 19:12, 17 December 2009 (CET)

chris-trolling is now pretty much: LET'S WATCH THE CWCIPEDIA AND LAUGH AT HIS ANSWERS, there's nothing. if you have something that isn't a boyfriend free girl blah. chris will forever be stressed out by gay ads no matter what jack says. also stop asking me stupid questions Clydec 21:13, 17 December 2009 (CET)

SEKRIT OPERATIONS

I was told you have a job for me on Asperpedia, I signed up. What do you need done with the images? --Fuckingstupid 20:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Operation Mailbag

Clyde, what's happening to that? It seems to have pretty much come to a halt. I guess it makes sense because there's now common questions, but I think the CWCki users should have some way of getting their questions posted (to improve articles and shed light on certain issues) - Will there be something like "Operation Common Questions"? --Wtv 14:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wallflower

Why no personal details? did you see tonight's video and you thought he would Budd Dwyer himself halfway through, I mean, WHAT THE FUCK? --Dan Dash 02:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

  • shut the fuck up, it's nothing to do with chris. it's about some stupid bitch who happened to get involved with some stupid faggot. Clydec 02:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Okay, so that whole page was fake? --Dan Dash 02:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

We need to have a word

You know where to go. --Champthom 08:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

DELETE DELETE DELETE

Clyde my pickle suited nigra. Why did you decimate Megans page? --YawningSquirtleRedux 07:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

check which parts i "decimated" it was superfluous. you fucking dumbshit Clydec 07:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Don't worry, I had the same concern YawningSquirtle. He just removed large excerpts of the Megan e-mails because people can refer to the Megan e-mail pages for those e-mails. We really need to do a better job of excerpting juicy bits from those e-mails instead of copy-pasta the whole damn thing in the article. --Champthom 16:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Might fine work Lou

I realized "Hey, maybe I should protect Edthehedgehog's page since people are vandalizing the fuck out of it" and then I see that you beat me to it. Fine work, but once again you have beaten me at my own game, Clyde. Kudos. --Champthom 05:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.

I really appreciate what you've done to help me and all. I've been working for over a month now to retrieve my userpage and to be honest I was quite surprised to see how fast he and his personal army sprang back up to trash it again. But anyway thank you for you assistance, Clyde. I am in your debt.--EdtheHedgehog1894 10:17, 25 April 2010 (EST)