Talk:Pedo-Glasses

I hope those Pedo-Glasses actually make him a pedo

I would have sex with him, even though I'm under 18.

• GTFO and sign your posts, Princess Chris Chan. Jump 20:07, 21 June 2009 (CEST)

Of Fail

Someone needs to move this page to Pedo-Glasses of Fail. –Ich bin schwul, Lynxr. Ich bin schwul.–  01:02, 17 December 2009 (CET)

Are there any Pedo-Glasses of Win? --Sonijew 03:12, 17 December 2009 (CET)

Even if the Pedo-Glasses are a relic by themselves, they are not failing in their task. We are not adding the term "Fail" to the PSEye neither.Griffintown 03:15, 17 December 2009 (CET)

They fail to make him not look like a pedo. --CWCAttack 03:25, 17 December 2009 (CET)

• Not every relic has to have the prefix "Of Fail." As I say on the Relic of Fail page, I'm starting to regret coming up with the suffix. Really, I think that "of Fail" should be appended for relics forged by Chris's hands. --Champthom 03:30, 17 December 2009 (CET)

Fair enough :) –Ich bin schwul, Lynxr. Ich bin schwul.–  03:34, 17 December 2009 (CET)

Actual pedos wearing actual pedo-glasses

Here's a couple of links to professional nonces proudly sporting their sexy specs; Patty Ann Kenley and Dennis Ferguson. Could and should these be incorporated into the article, or has the point about Chris' unfortunate taste in eye-wear well enough made? Blusko 06:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

• There's also the child rapist/murderer from The Lovely Bones (named after Chris' future wife, of course). Image below. The resemblance between this man and Chris is just uncanny IMHO. -Ronichu 08:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

No it isn't. That guy was divorced, so not a virgin with rage. It took a lot of time and effort to build the underground dungeon - Crhis would be too lazy. Also, that guy was able to convince the jerkops that he was a normal person - Chris would just have shouted about trolls and tried to run away. Eamoo 18:01, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

Moving "Dramatic Glasses Removal"

Due to the section's small stature, i was going to copy the information in the DGR section to their own page in the "Mannerisms" category and then expand on it. It could probably do with some additions.

Does anyone have any objections?

--Jakkarra 16:36, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

• Before you do anything, you really should draft the page. It's a small section because there isn't much to say. I'd say get someone to approve your draft before you start making edits to existing articles. That might not be the rule here. I don't remember. It is on other wikis I edit on though. Freecell 17:15, 21 October 2010 (PDT)

Probably. I wasnt entirely sure of the expected etiquette, which is why i was asking before i did anything important. --Jakkarra 03:16, 22 October 2010 (PDT)