Difference between revisions of "Talk:Asperchu"
Pfargtl9000 (talk | contribs) |
(→Asperpedia: new section) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I think he's now a separate enough entity from asperchu that he deserves his own page.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 18:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | I think he's now a separate enough entity from asperchu that he deserves his own page.--[[User:Beat|Beat]] 18:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Indeed. [[User:Pfargtl9000|Pfargtl9000]] 21:50, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | *Indeed. [[User:Pfargtl9000|Pfargtl9000]] 21:50, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Asperpedia == | |||
Anyone else notice that there were new Aperchu comics posted only a few days ago? | |||
Revision as of 11:50, 2 March 2011
So the consensus seems to be that We should have a main namespace article for Asperchu. I tweaked my Alec Benson Leary article a bit, and now here we are. I hope it doesn't suck too bad.--Beat 17:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Phone calls
While transcripts are all well and good, would it be possible to but the mp3 links back onto the pages? Isarko 06:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
The last Asperchu ad
Did anyone save it? Because a text-only description doesn't seem up to par, and we have the other ads up, so... N. Onymous 23:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Pfargtl9000 01:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Alec Benson Leary
Is now the subject of 9 phone calls, loads of e-mails (most recently one leaked to the community portal). He's also the first example of the very subtle sort of trolling, later used to great effect by Jackie.
I think he's now a separate enough entity from asperchu that he deserves his own page.--Beat 18:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. Pfargtl9000 21:50, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Asperpedia
Anyone else notice that there were new Aperchu comics posted only a few days ago?