Difference between revisions of "User talk:NeoShadow/Infobox 2.0 Experiment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:*I'm going to agree with Champ on this. It's clearly better than the old one. Plus, it's roughly the same size as the old one, so it shouldn't interfere with the layout of articles at all. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell|c)]] 11:25, 14 April 2011 (PDT) | :*I'm going to agree with Champ on this. It's clearly better than the old one. Plus, it's roughly the same size as the old one, so it shouldn't interfere with the layout of articles at all. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell|c)]] 11:25, 14 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
*Yeah, man, it works just like the old infobox. Same usage. Simple and easy. Like, if you put this in the page of the current infobox, all the infoboxes would update with no problems. | *Yeah, man, it works just like the old infobox. Same usage. Simple and easy. Like, if you put this in the page of the current infobox, all the infoboxes would update with no problems. Except for one thing. If the text in any of the info fields under the video is too long, it doesnt automatically jump to the next line, it stretches the infobox beyond the width of the video, so on some occasions it may be neccesary to manually skip some of the text to the next line (as you see done on this experiment page), but other than that, its all good. --[[User:NeoShadow|NeoShadow]] 13:03, 14 April 2011 (PDT) | ||
Except for one thing. If the text in any of the info fields under the video is too long, it doesnt automatically jump to the next line, it stretches the infobox beyond the width of the video, so on some occasions it may be neccesary to manually skip some of the text to the next line (as you see done on this experiment page), but other than that, its all good. --[[User:NeoShadow|NeoShadow]] 13:03, 14 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:12, 14 April 2011
- Wow, that is VERY nice. Just curious, is it different to use than the current Infobox? Personally, I'd go ahead and change the current infobox, yours is a lot better, but I'd try to solicit feedback from other users first. --Champthom 10:49, 14 April 2011 (PDT)
- Yeah, man, it works just like the old infobox. Same usage. Simple and easy. Like, if you put this in the page of the current infobox, all the infoboxes would update with no problems. Except for one thing. If the text in any of the info fields under the video is too long, it doesnt automatically jump to the next line, it stretches the infobox beyond the width of the video, so on some occasions it may be neccesary to manually skip some of the text to the next line (as you see done on this experiment page), but other than that, its all good. --NeoShadow 13:03, 14 April 2011 (PDT)