Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ian Brandon Anderson"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::Supporting this. --[[User:Old meme|Old meme]] 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT) | ::Supporting this. --[[User:Old meme|Old meme]] 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT) | ||
:Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. [[User:Giantgroundsloth|Giantgroundsloth]] 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:12, 24 July 2011
We need a plausible theory of when Chris became CChanSonichuCWC (as in explaining the weight differences, that sort of thing). --Champthom 02:43, 16 August 2009 (CEST)
Isnt cwcki more of a documentation of chris's life rather then satirical like ED? would it not make sense then to eliminate all references of chris as Ian, even here, and here instead just explain why people started using the name IBA? I also dislike it as its confusing and basically taking limel;ight off of chris and celebrating the trolls, chris trolls himself mostly --Bentduck 12:14, 10 August 2010 (PDT)
- True, it is pretty confusing. I support this. --GandWuser 12:24, 10 August 2010 (PDT)
Pff, no. --Sonijew is back 05:45, 11 August 2010 (PDT)
This page is unfunny and encourages newfaggotry. I know we play all this in character with pages on trolls like Clyde Cash and the like, but this is going too far. Can we please nuke all the roleplaying bullshit in this article and make it a simple summary of the name itself and the annoying meme it spawned? It's not like the events in it aren't already covered in other articles in greater detail, and anyone new to Chris-Chan coming to this article for an explaination are just going to end up confused. If CWCki's purpose is to inform and explain about Chris, then this article is like the anti-CWCki --Old meme 10:03, 23 July 2011 (PDT)
- The majority of this shit was folded into Liquid Chris a long time ago, when that article was extensively rewritten. With the blessings of the powers that be, somebody should read through it carefully, compare it with Liquid Chris, move over any remaining interesting bits, and then redirect it to Liquid Chris. Dude 22:40, 23 July 2011 (PDT)
- Supporting this. --Old meme 04:22, 24 July 2011 (PDT)
- Can't we just delete everything except the first section, then completely rewrite what's left, so it's just reporting that, "hey, here's a thing that happened!"? Personally, I think the whole Ian thing's kinda funny... to a point. Giantgroundsloth 14:12, 24 July 2011 (PDT)