Difference between revisions of "Talk:Futurama"

Revision as of 16:58, 25 September 2011

Nice. This is the sort of format I think other articles of things Chris has ripped off should look like. --Champthom 04:37, 17 February 2009 (CET)

Am I the only one who thinks this should be merged with the The Simpsons article? The article could be split in two sections: one about The Simpsons and one about Futurama. --Mary Lee Walsh | All hail the dean! 14:58, 25 September 2011 (PDT)

Revision as of 03:48, 3 January 2010 (view source) Clydec (talk \| contribs) m (1 revision) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:58, 25 September 2011 (view source) MissMeg (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Nice. This is the sort of format I think other articles of things Chris has ripped off should look like. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 04:37, 17 February 2009 (CET)		Nice. This is the sort of format I think other articles of things Chris has ripped off should look like. --[[User:Champthom\|Champthom]] 04:37, 17 February 2009 (CET)

			*Am I the only one who thinks this should be merged with the [[The Simpsons]] article? The article could be split in two sections: one about The Simpsons and one about Futurama. --[[User:MissMeg\|Mary Lee Walsh \| All hail the dean!]] 14:58, 25 September 2011 (PDT)