Difference between revisions of "Talk:28 October 2011"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
===Title=== | ===Title=== | ||
Shouldn't the title be Americanized? September 11th isn't referred to as 11/9.--[[User:Steve Landcleamer|Steve Landcleamer]] 16:06, 5 November 2011 (PDT) | Shouldn't the title be Americanized? September 11th isn't referred to as 11/9.--[[User:Steve Landcleamer|Steve Landcleamer]] 16:06, 5 November 2011 (PDT) | ||
:We have a few articles with titles like this ([[12_October_2009|e.g.]]), so while I don't know if it's "right" or not, much like "Chris's", it's just become a standard. Good eye, though. I didn't catch that it wasn't Americanised. [[User:Freecell|Freecell]] [[User_talk:Freecell|(t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Freecell|c)]] 16:11, 5 November 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:11, 5 November 2011
Proposed article
This is my proposed solution to how we manage and collect information pertaining to the events of October 28th 2011.
To-do:
- Add categories
- Add more verifiable information
Screencap the pages from the court website for preservation.
--Anonymax 14:44, 5 November 2011 (PDT)
- Do we have a field agent that can attend the court hearing? That should give us the entire story behind all of this --SargentPickles 13:15, 5 November 2011 (PDT)
Shouldn't it be mentioned this is the first (major) event since Bob died? --IwegalBadnik 13:43, 5 November 2011 (PDT)
Title
Shouldn't the title be Americanized? September 11th isn't referred to as 11/9.--Steve Landcleamer 16:06, 5 November 2011 (PDT)