Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rocky Shoemaker call"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:


:Champ is good people and I agree with him. --[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 06:59, 11 December 2011 (PST)
:Champ is good people and I agree with him. --[[User:Ronichu|Ronichu]] 06:59, 11 December 2011 (PST)
*Thirded, really. God damn. --[[User:Shefap2|Shefap2]] 07:13, 11 December 2011 (PST)

Revision as of 10:13, 11 December 2011

To be honest, I'm not entirely comfortable with this being here, but not for the reasons you think. While technically Virginia allows for recording calls with the consent of one party (i.e. the party that's recording), I think Rocky might be bothered by a private call being here. Unlike Chris, she most likely has an IQ greater than that of a brick and would be bothered by the invasion of her privacy and that sort of thing. Secondly, why do we have to have the entire conversation here? That's what irks me sometimes, people think we need to mirror and host everything connected with Chris. I don't think so, I think we should just cite the audio file and that's sufficient as opposed to having an entire article about the call with a full transcript. Thirdly, I think this would set a dangerous precedent, as I'd rather not see people harass people connected to Chris for content. These people, unlike Chris, probably do mind if a stranger calls them, talks about their acquaintance with Chris, however nebulous, and then posts their private call for the entire Internet to see.

I realize that this provides valuable information but I'd rather see this information obtained through other means, such as public records or that sort of thing.

If we are to keep it, I'd recommend wikifying the transcript and categorizing the call.--Champthom 04:40, 11 December 2011 (PST)

Champ is good people and I agree with him. --Ronichu 06:59, 11 December 2011 (PST)
  • Thirded, really. God damn. --Shefap2 07:13, 11 December 2011 (PST)