Difference between revisions of "Talk:Futurama"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Am I the only one who thinks this should be merged with the [[The Simpsons]] article? The article could be split in two sections: one about The Simpsons and one about Futurama. --[[User:MissMeg|Mary Lee Walsh | All hail the dean!]] 14:58, 25 September 2011 (PDT) | *Am I the only one who thinks this should be merged with the [[The Simpsons]] article? The article could be split in two sections: one about The Simpsons and one about Futurama. --[[User:MissMeg|Mary Lee Walsh | All hail the dean!]] 14:58, 25 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
Would it be worth mentioning that Futurama did make a joke about [[Third date|sex on the third date]] in an episode? --[[User:Smotpoker|Smotpoker]] 15:56, 30 January 2012 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 18:56, 30 January 2012
Nice. This is the sort of format I think other articles of things Chris has ripped off should look like. --Champthom 04:37, 17 February 2009 (CET)
- Am I the only one who thinks this should be merged with the The Simpsons article? The article could be split in two sections: one about The Simpsons and one about Futurama. --Mary Lee Walsh | All hail the dean! 14:58, 25 September 2011 (PDT)
Would it be worth mentioning that Futurama did make a joke about sex on the third date in an episode? --Smotpoker 15:56, 30 January 2012 (PST)