Difference between revisions of "Talk:Anelie saga"

From CWCki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==How is this not bullshit?== So you present no source material and a bunch of unsubstantiated claims. Worse, you run the risk of blowing her cover. The correspondence is supp...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==How is this not bullshit?==
==How is this not bullshit?==
So you present no source material and a bunch of unsubstantiated claims. Worse, you run the risk of blowing her cover. The correspondence is supposedly ongoing but you felt it necessary to make this page anyhow. This is pointless and counterproductive.[[User:Asperhes|Asperhes]] ([[User talk:Asperhes|talk]]) 04:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
So you present no source material and a bunch of unsubstantiated claims. Worse, you run the risk of blowing her cover. The correspondence is supposedly ongoing but you felt it necessary to make this page anyhow. This is pointless and counterproductive.[[User:Asperhes|Asperhes]] ([[User talk:Asperhes|talk]]) 04:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't even think Chris has revealed anything about this "Anelie" girl. I'm all and up for [[Tobacky|shooting this up to the moon]]. --[[User:FromtheWordsofBR|FromtheWordsofBR]] ([[User talk:FromtheWordsofBR|talk]]) 13:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:10, 6 September 2015

How is this not bullshit?

So you present no source material and a bunch of unsubstantiated claims. Worse, you run the risk of blowing her cover. The correspondence is supposedly ongoing but you felt it necessary to make this page anyhow. This is pointless and counterproductive.Asperhes (talk) 04:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't even think Chris has revealed anything about this "Anelie" girl. I'm all and up for shooting this up to the moon. --FromtheWordsofBR (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)